MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407376833 · doi:10.1353/vpr.2024.a951301

Mary Elizabeth Braddon vs. the Pall Mall Gazette : Controlling and Exploiting the Boundaries of Editorial Identity

2024· article· en· W4407376833 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Carley Robertson

Bibliographic record

VenueVictorian periodicals review · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAustralian History and Society
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIdentity (music)HistoryArtAesthetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract: In late 1867, the Pall Mall Gazette published a series of articles and letters alleging that Babington White’s Circe was plagiarized from Octave Feuillet’s Dalila . Couched as an argument for literary integrity, the increasingly personal and virulent attacks targeted not only White but also the periodical Belgravia and its editress Mary Elizabeth Braddon. The resulting back-and-forth reads like a drama set in the pages of the newspaper; however, close analysis of the rhetorical moves of the various players points to larger gendered debates about who was allowed to operate in the literary marketplace and under what conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.012
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.019
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.064

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0120.019
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0070.016
Scholarly communication0.0150.004
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.321
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVictorian periodicals reviewSame topicAustralian History and SocietyFrench-language works237,207