MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407378458 · doi:10.1002/adfm.202421522

<i>Ocyropsis</i>‐Inspired Fast‐Swimming Transparent Soft Robots

2025· article· en· W4407378458 on OpenAlexaff
Zhiqiu Ye, Geng Yang, Hongjie Dai, Yinliang Gan, Yihui Jian, Kaichen Xu, M. Jamal Deen, Jiaxu Xia, Na Tian, Yihong Yang, Huayong Yang, Chao Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvanced Functional Materials · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSoft Robotics and Applications
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersZhejiang UniversityNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaTencent
KeywordsMaterials scienceSoft roboticsRobotNanotechnologyArtificial intelligenceComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Marine creatures achieve effective survival in unstructured ocean environments via fast swimming or transparent camouflage. Aqueous soft robots, capable of reproducing soft features of marine creatures, have the advantages of safe biological interaction, high environmental adaptation, and noise‐free when compared with traditional rigid robots. Yet, there exists a persistent challenge to develop both fast and energy‐efficient aqueous soft robots that can achieve better underwater operation or exploration. Enlightened by the morphology and swimming strategy of Ocyropsis — a jellyfish‐like creature, Ocyropsis‐inspired robots (i.e., Ocyrobots) that merge electro‐hydraulic actuation and Ocyropsis‐type rowing mechanisms to achieve high‐performance underwater locomotion are developed. Ocyrobots demonstrate a record‐high speed of 1.1 body length/s, which is approximately three times of previously reported fastest jellyfish‐like robots while maintaining a low power consumption of 37 mW. Ocyrobots also exhibit an impressive turning speed of 34° s−1, enabling dexterous locomotion and effective obstacle avoidance in confined underwater scenarios. Attributed to the self‐developed highly reliable polymer‐based ionic gel, Ocyrobots possess remarkable advantages of full transparency and high durability, which improves their lifetime and reduces potential disturbances to underwater ecosystems. The unprecedented biomimetic idea in this study is essential in enlightening the prototyping of future aqueous soft robotics.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdvanced Functional MaterialsSame topicSoft Robotics and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207