MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407385849 · doi:10.1145/3717582.3717588

A Maple Program to Factor Multivariate Polynomials Given by Black Boxes

2024· article· en· W4407385849 on OpenAlexaff
Tian Chen, Michael Monagan

Bibliographic record

VenueACM communications in computer algebra · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicPolynomial and algebraic computation
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMapleFactor (programming language)Multivariate statisticsMathematicsMultivariate analysisAlgebra over a fieldPure mathematicsComputer scienceStatisticsProgramming languageBotanyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Let a be a polynomial in Z[ x 1 , x 2 , …,x n ]. Let α ∈ Z n and p be a large prime. Let B be a modular black box representation for a , that is, B : Z n × { p } → Z p such that B( α,p ) outputs a ( α ) mod p. In our implementation B is a Maple procedure. We present a Maple program CMBBSHL which on input of B outputs the irreducible factorization Π r i =1 f e i i of a ( x 1 ,…, x n ) with high probability. Our program is a combination of Maple codes and C codes where the main programs are implemented in Maple and several subroutines are implemented in C for increased efficiency. We present (1) a description of the algorithm, (2) a demonstration of the software, (3) a timing benchmark, and (4) some implementation details.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Open science
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.939
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0060.005
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.329
Teacher spread0.292 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueACM communications in computer algebraSame topicPolynomial and algebraic computationFrench-language works237,207