MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407387066 · doi:10.1093/ijnp/pyae059.131

TSPO PET BRAIN INFLAMMATION IMAGING: A TRANSDIAGNOSTIC SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS OF 156 CASE-CONTROL STUDIES

2025· article· en· W4407387066 on OpenAlexaff
Livia De Picker, Manuel Morrens, Igor Branchi, Bartholomeus C. M. Haarman, Tatsuhiro Terada, Min Su Kang, Delphine Boche, Marie‐Ève Tremblay, Claire Leroy, Michel Bottlaender, Julie Ottoy

Bibliographic record

VenueThe International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicHereditary Neurological Disorders
Canadian institutionsUniversity of VictoriaMcGill UniversityUniversity of British ColumbiaUniversity of TorontoSunnybrook Health Science Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMeta-analysisPet imagingMedicineNeuroimagingInflammationNeurosciencePsychologyPositron emission tomographyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction The 18-kDa translocator protein (TSPO) is increasingly recognized as a molecular target for PET imaging of inflammatory responses in various CNS disorders, but its usefulness appears to vary greatly across disorders, disease stages, and applied quantification methods. To advance TSPO PET as a potential biomarker to evaluate brain inflammation and anti-inflammatory therapies, a better understanding of its applicability across disorders is needed. We conducted a transdiagnostic systematic review and meta-analysis of all in vivo human TSPO PET imaging case-control studies in the CNS. Specifically, we investigated the direction, strength, and heterogeneity associated with the TSPO PET signal across disorders in pre-specified brain regions, and explored the demographic and methodological sources of heterogeneity. Methods We performed a systematic search for studies reporting in vivo human case-control TSPO PET differences. A random-effects meta-analysis was applied to estimate case-control standardized mean differences (SMD) of the TSPO PET signal in the lobar/whole-brain cortical grey matter (cGM), thalamus, and cortico-limbic circuitry between different illness categories. Heterogeneity was evaluated with the I² statistic and explored using subgroup and meta-regression analyses for radioligand generation, PET quantification method, age, sex, and publication year. Results 156 individual case-control studies were included in the systematic review, incorporating data for 2381 healthy controls and 2626 patients. 139 studies documented meta-analysable data and were grouped into 11 illness categories. Across all the illness categories, we observed a significantly higher TSPO PET signal in cases compared to controls for the cGM (n=121 studies, SMD=0.358, PFDR<0.001, I²=68%), with a significant difference between the illness categories (P=0.004). cGM increases were only significant for Alzheimer’ s disease and other neurodegenerative disorders. Cortico-limbic increases (n=97 studies, SMD=0.541, P<0.001, I²=67%) were most prominent for Alzheimer’ s dementia, mild cognitive impairment, other neurodegenerative disorders, mood disorders and multiple sclerosis. Thalamic involvement (n=79 studies, SMD=0.393, P<0.001, I²=71%) was observed for Alzheimer’ s disease, other neurodegenerative disorders, multiple sclerosis, and chronic pain and functional disorders (all PFDR<0.05). Main outcomes for immunological disorders, viral infections, substance use disorders, schizophrenia and traumatic brain injury were not significant. We identified multiple sources of between-study variance to the TSPO PET signal including a strong transdiagnostic effect of the quantification method (explaining 25% of between-study variance; VT-based SMD=0.000 versus reference tissue-based studies SMD=0.630; F=20.49, df=1;103, P<0.001), patient age (9% of variance), and radioligand generation (5% of variance). Conclusion We observed robust increases in the TSPO signal for specific types of disorders, which were widespread or focal depending on illness category. We also found a large and transdiagnostic positive shift of the effect estimates of reference tissue-based compared to VT-based studies. Our results can support future studies to optimize experimental design and power calculations, by taking into account the type of disorder, brain region-of-interest, radioligand, and quantification method. References De Picker LJ, Morrens M, Branchi I, Haarman BCM, Terada T, Kang MS, Boche D, Tremblay ME, Leroy C, Bottlaender M, Ottoy J. TSPO PET brain inflammation imaging: A transdiagnostic systematic review and meta-analysis of 156 case-control studies. Brain Behav Immun. 2023 Oct;113:415-431. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2023.07.023. Epub 2023 Aug 3. PMID: 37543251.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: Meta-analysis
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.513
Threshold uncertainty score0.715

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.390
Teacher spread0.335 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designMeta-analysis
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe International Journal of NeuropsychopharmacologySame topicHereditary Neurological DisordersFrench-language works237,207