MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407387152 · doi:10.1093/ijnp/pyae059.581

ANTIDEPRESSANT ACTIVITY OF LEFT UNILATERAL TRANSCRANIAL DIRECT STIMULATION OF EXCITABLE GABAERGIC NEURONS

2025· article· en· W4407387152 on OpenAlexaff
Gavin Afonso, Shannon Waye, Tadhg Strand, Francis Rodriguez Bambico

Bibliographic record

VenueThe International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeurological Disorders and Treatments
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGABAergicAntidepressantNeuroscienceStimulationPsychologyMedicinePhysical medicine and rehabilitationAnesthesiaInhibitory postsynaptic potentialHippocampus

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a non-invasive method of neuromodulation that employs a mild electrical discharge to stimulate brain regions beneath a cathode-anode electrode ensemble. tDCS increases cell excitability without drastically modifying bursting and firing frequency ( Pelletier 2014). As the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) is crucial for the antidepressant response, mPFC-tDCS has been explored as a potential therapeutic strategy for major depression (Thibault 2021). Previous research suggests that direct stimulation of the mPFC has antidepressant effects in a clinical subpopulation (Chrisykou 2022). However, the precise molecular mechanisms underlying tDCS effects remain unknown. Aims Using a rat model of mPFC-directed tDCS, we assessed the therapeutically relevant impact of bilateral (BL) and unilateral left (UL) or right (UR) stimulation in behavioural tests for antidepressant-related properties (sucrose preference test [SPT] and forced swim test [FST]) and anxiolytic-like properties (novelty-suppressed feeding test [NSFT] and open-field test [OFT]). We sought to test the involvement of cortical gamma-amino butyric acid (GABA) circuits, as with other treatment modalities (Fogaca 2019). Results The stress-inducing paradigm employed was olfactory bulbectomy (OBX). Twenty-one days post-OBx surgery, animals were submitted to acute (20-min) or subchronic (5-7 days) cathodic stimulations with or without an injection of the small-conductance, calcium-activated potassium channel 3-preferring (SKC3) antagonist, NS8593 (1 mg/kg, i.p.). Low (0.05 or 0.1 mA) or zero intensity stimulation was delivered over the mPFC via the cathode, followed by behavioural testing, brain extraction and slicing. RNAscope in situ-hybridization (ISH) was done to examine the differential activation of discrete GABAergic cell types (somatostatin [SST+ GABAergic], parvalbumin [PV+ GABAergic] and CAMKII mRNA probes) in the mPFC-limbic projections, using an mRNA probe for zif268. Method OBx+NS8593-treated males showed a therapeutic-like response to UL stimulation only. In the OFT, OBx-males exhibited a significant antidepressant/anxiolytic-like reduction of motor activity compared to drug-naï ve/OBx animals, and similar to control, non-OBx levels (p<.05). In the SPT, these animals showed a reversal of anhedonia-like reduction of SP scores. ISH imaging of zif268 revealed significant increases in neural activity within the targeted and projections regions. Specifically, there was a significant activation (p<.01) in the cingulate, prelimbic and orbital regions, insular cortex and claustrum. RNAscope ISH for discrete GABAergic cell types (SST, PV and CAMKII) is underway. Discussion A combination of tDCS and NS8593 led to a potent antidepressant-like response. In principle, NS8593 inhibits SKC3 in interneurons, enhancing their excitability, consequently leading to tDCS induced GABAergic activation. In effect, a pathological mPFC hyperactivity is alleviated, yielding therapeutic- like effect. Conclusion: These findings suggest that tDCS in combination with excitability priming achieves selective patterns of brain regional and cell-specific activation. This novel strategy offers a potentially effective alternative to psychotropic drug treatments. References 1.Pelletier SJ, Cicchetti F. 2014, ‘Cellular and molecular mechanisms of action of transcranial direct current stimulation: evidence from in vitro and in vivo models’, International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology, vol. 18, issue 2, 2.Bittar P., Labonte B. 2021, ‘Functional Contribution of the Medial Prefrontal Circuitry in Major Depressive Disorder and Stress-Induced Depressive-Like Behaviors’, Vol 15, 3.Chrysikou E., Wing E., van Dam W. 2022, ‘Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Over the Prefrontal Cortex in Depression Modulates Cortical Excitability in Emotion Regulation Regions as Measured by Concurrent Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging: An Exploratory Study’, Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging, Vol 7, Issue 1, pp 85-94, 4.Fogaç a V., Duman S. 2019, ‘Cortical GABAergic Dysfunction in Stress and Depression: New Insights for Therapeutic Interventions’, Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience, Vol 13,

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.334
Teacher spread0.308 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe International Journal of NeuropsychopharmacologySame topicNeurological Disorders and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207