MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407387444 · doi:10.1093/ijnp/pyae059.442

COURAGE AND TRANSFORMATION: PATIENT EXPERIENCES OF WEB- BASED EMDR FOR SUICIDAL IDEATION

2025· article· en· W4407387444 on OpenAlexaff
Sidney Yap, Mina Youakim, Ashraf Aborawi, G. Pinto, Krystle Samways, Amy Beck, Katherine Bright, Suzette Brémault‐Phillips, Andrew J. Greenshaw, Olga Winkler, Lisa Burback

Bibliographic record

VenueThe International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicEmpathy and Medical Education
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCourageSuicidal ideationIdeationPsychologyPsychotherapistSuicidal behaviorClinical psychologyMedicineMedical emergencySuicide preventionCognitive sciencePoison control

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Psychological trauma and adversity are known risk factors for developing suicidal ideation (SI), a marker of severe stress or psychological burden (Winkler et al. 2021). Unfortunately, established interventions for SI have limitations, are often suboptimally effective, resource-intensive, or suffer from high attrition (D’ Anci et al. 2019; Steyn, Koen and Jarvis 2022). Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR) psychotherapy, initially designed to treat Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), has shown potential as a novel approach for SI (Fereidouni et al. 2019; Proudlock and Peris 2020). Early studies indicate that trauma-focused psychotherapies (TFP) like EMDR may be used safely and effectively with those reporting SI, potentially reducing SI over the course of treatment (Burback et al 2023). However, intense emotions evoked during treatment convey a risk for worsening or treatment-emergent SI (Larsen et al 2016). This risk may drive clinician hesitancy, exacerbating barriers to treatment access. Further, significant research gaps remain, including understanding a) patient experiences during trauma therapy, especially for populations with SI, and b) what individual and contextual factors may impact outcomes and safety, including those related to the online environment (Burback 2023). Therefore, qualitative studies are needed to explore these issues. Aims and Objectives This qualitative study aimed to capture and explore the experiences of adult outpatients who received web-based, therapist-delivered EMDR targeting events associated with their SI. Methods Participants were recruited from a randomized controlled trial (RCT) investigating web-based EMDR for adults with SI (Winkler et al. 2021). This study measured the impact of receiving web-based EMDR on the severity of SI and symptoms of PTSD, depression, anxiety, dissociation, and emotional regulation. This “real-world” study included a broad range of patients, but excluded those with psychosis, mania, or dissociative disorders. Participants from the EMDR treatment group were invited to engage in this qualitative study, and were interviewed individually via Zoom, using a semi-structured approach (Biddle et al. 2012). Data collection and initial coding were conducted at arms-length from RCT study investigators. Braun and Clarke’ s framework for qualitative thematic analysis was used to guide inductive analysis; no pre-existing coding frame was imposed on the data (Braun &Clarke 2012). Results Twenty RCT participants were enrolled in the EMDR treatment group, and 14 agreed to be interviewed. Preliminary analysis indicated data saturation and therefore adequate sample size. Participants reported, generally positively, on treatment efficacy, accessibility, safety, and recommendations for future improvement. Data analysis is currently ongoing and final results will be forthcoming. Discussion and Conclusion To our knowledge, this is the first study exploring patient experiences of trauma therapy that focused specifically on experiences associated with their suicidal ideation, rather than a psychiatric diagnosis. If confirmed, positive results could indicate a new transdiagnostic method for addressing suicidal ideation. This is also amongst the first studies reporting on web-based EMDR, which could improve access to care. Larger trials, including those with more severe dissociative symptoms, are needed to further explore the impact of such treatment for SI. References 1.Winkler O, Dhaliwal R, Greenshaw A, O'Shea K, Abba-Aji A, Chima C, Purdon SE and Burback L (2021) Web-based eye movement desensitization and reprocessing for adults with suicidal ideation: protocol for a randomized controlled trial. JMIR Research Protocols 10(11): e30711. DOI: 10.2196/30711. 2.D'Anci KE, Uhl S, Giradi G and Martin C (2019) Treatments for the prevention and management of suicide. Annals of Internal Medicine 171(5): 334. DOI: 10.7326/m19-0869. 3.Steyn PJ, Koen L and Jarvis L (2022) Characteristics of inpatients in dialectical behaviour therapy modified for a resource-limited setting. South African Journal of Psychiatry 28: 1701. DOI: 10.4102/sajpsychiatry.v28i0.1701. 4.Fereidouni Z, Behnammoghadam M, Jahanfar A and Dehghan A (2019) The effect of eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR) on the severity of suicidal thoughts in patients with major depressive disorder: a randomized controlled trial. Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment 15: pp.2459- 2466. DOI: 10.2147/NDT.S210757. 5.Proudlock S and Peris J (2020) Using EMDR therapy with patients in an acute mental health crisis. BMC Psychiatry 20(1): pp.1-9. DOI: 10.1186/s12888-019-2426-7. 6.Burback L, Dhaliwal R, Reeson M, Erick T, Hartle K, Chow E, Vouronikos G, Antunes N, Marshall T, Kennedy M, Dennett L, Greenshaw A, Smith-MacDonald L, and Winkler O (2023) Trauma focused psychotherapy in patients with suicidal ideation: a scoping review. Current Research in Behavioral Sciences 4:100102. DOI: 10.1016/j.crbeha.2023.100102. 7.Larsen SE, Stirman SW, Smith BN and Resick PA (2016) Symptom exacerbations in trauma-focused treatments: associations with treatment outcome and non-completion. Behaviour Research and Therapy 77: pp.68-77. DOI: 10.1016/j.brat.2015.12.009. 8.Biddle L, Cooper J, Owen-Smith A, Klineberg E, Bennewith O, Hawton K, Kapur N, Donovan J and Gunnell D (2012) Qualitative interviewing with vulnerable populations: individuals' experiences of participating in suicide and self-harm based research. Journal of Affective Disorders 145(3): 356-362. DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2012.08.024. 9.Braun V and Clarke V (2012) Thematic analysis. In: Cooper H, Camic PM, Long DL, Panter AT, Rindskopf D and Sher KJ (eds) APA handbook of research methods in psychology, Vol. 2. Research designs: Quantitative, qualitative, neuropsychological, and biological. American Psychological Association, pp.57–71.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.022
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.035

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.022
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0060.008
Scholarly communication0.0050.005
Open science0.0010.006
Research integrity0.0030.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.362
Teacher spread0.346 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe International Journal of NeuropsychopharmacologySame topicEmpathy and Medical EducationFrench-language works237,207