ImmunoTar—integrative prioritization of cell surface targets for cancer immunotherapy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
MOTIVATION: Cancer remains a leading cause of mortality globally. Recent improvements in survival have been facilitated by the development of targeted and less toxic immunotherapies, such as chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cells and antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs). These therapies, effective in treating both pediatric and adult patients with solid and hematological malignancies, rely on the identification of cancer-specific surface protein targets. While technologies like RNA sequencing and proteomics exist to survey these targets, identifying optimal targets for immunotherapies remains a challenge in the field. RESULTS: To address this challenge, we developed ImmunoTar, a novel computational tool designed to systematically prioritize candidate immunotherapeutic targets. ImmunoTar integrates user-provided RNA-sequencing or proteomics data with quantitative features from multiple public databases, selected based on predefined criteria, to generate a score representing the gene's suitability as an immunotherapeutic target. We validated ImmunoTar using three distinct cancer datasets, demonstrating its effectiveness in identifying both known and novel targets across various cancer phenotypes. By compiling diverse data into a unified platform, ImmunoTar enables comprehensive evaluation of surface proteins, streamlining target identification and empowering researchers to efficiently allocate resources, thereby accelerating the development of effective cancer immunotherapies. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Code and data to run and test ImmunoTar are available at https://github.com/sacanlab/immunotar.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".