MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407389620 · doi:10.1016/j.aim.2025.110148

Constructions of Turán systems that are tight up to a multiplicative constant

2025· article· en· W4407389620 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Oleg Pikhurko

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvances in Mathematics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCellular Automata and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersH2020 European Research CouncilEuropean Research Council
KeywordsMathematicsMultiplicative functionConstant (computer programming)Mathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

For positive integers n ⩾ s > r , the Turán function T ( n , s , r ) is the smallest size of an r -graph with n vertices such that every set of s vertices contains at least one edge. Also, define the Turán density t ( s , r ) as the limit of T ( n , s , r ) / ( n r ) as n → ∞ . The question of estimating these parameters received a lot of attention after it was first raised by Turán in 1941. A trivial lower bound is t ( s , r ) ⩾ 1 / ( s s − r ) . In the 1990s, de Caen conjectured that r ⋅ t ( r + 1 , r ) → ∞ as r → ∞ and offered 500 Canadian dollars for resolving this question. We disprove this conjecture by showing more strongly that for every integer R ⩾ 1 there is μ R (in fact, μ R can be taken to grow as ( 1 + o ( 1 ) ) R ln ⁡ R ) such that t ( r + R , r ) ⩽ ( μ R + o ( 1 ) ) / ( r + R R ) as r → ∞ , that is, the trivial lower bound is tight for every R up to a multiplicative constant μ R .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.018
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.037

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.018
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.004
Scholarly communication0.0040.008
Open science0.0020.006
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdvances in MathematicsSame topicCellular Automata and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207