MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407389620 · doi:10.1016/j.aim.2025.110148

Constructions of Turán systems that are tight up to a multiplicative constant

2025· article· en· W4407389620 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvances in Mathematics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCellular Automata and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersH2020 European Research CouncilEuropean Research Council
KeywordsMathematicsMultiplicative functionConstant (computer programming)Mathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

For positive integers n ⩾ s > r , the Turán function T ( n , s , r ) is the smallest size of an r -graph with n vertices such that every set of s vertices contains at least one edge. Also, define the Turán density t ( s , r ) as the limit of T ( n , s , r ) / ( n r ) as n → ∞ . The question of estimating these parameters received a lot of attention after it was first raised by Turán in 1941. A trivial lower bound is t ( s , r ) ⩾ 1 / ( s s − r ) . In the 1990s, de Caen conjectured that r ⋅ t ( r + 1 , r ) → ∞ as r → ∞ and offered 500 Canadian dollars for resolving this question. We disprove this conjecture by showing more strongly that for every integer R ⩾ 1 there is μ R (in fact, μ R can be taken to grow as ( 1 + o ( 1 ) ) R ln ⁡ R ) such that t ( r + R , r ) ⩽ ( μ R + o ( 1 ) ) / ( r + R R ) as r → ∞ , that is, the trivial lower bound is tight for every R up to a multiplicative constant μ R .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.811
Threshold uncertainty score0.365

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it