MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407393258 · doi:10.3138/jmvfh-2024-0002

Predicting well-being among military health care workers: The role of self-care and leadership

2025· article· en· W4407393258 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Amanda R. Start, John Eric M. Novosel-Lingat, Yvonne S. Allard, Amy B. Adler

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Military Veteran and Family Health · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicHealthcare professionals’ stress and burnout
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHealth carePsychologyNursingMedicinePolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: U.S. military health care workers were surveyed regarding individual and organizational factors that might promote professional well-being. Relevant factors can be used as a blueprint for supportive interventions. Methods: Military health care workers from two military treatment facilities were surveyed (N = 204). Individual (i.e., self-care attitudes and behaviours) and organizational (i.e., health-promoting leadership) factors were assessed at baseline, and compassion fatigue, burnout, and effective functioning were assessed at three-month follow-up. Path mediation models assessed 1) the role of self-care behaviours in predicting well-being, 2) the degree to which self-care behaviours mediated the relationship between self-care attitudes and well-being, and 3) whether self-care behaviours mediated the relationship between health-promoting leadership and well-being. Results: The majority (98.5%) of participants regularly engaged in at least one self-care behaviour, and more than half (56.0%) indicated their leaders engaged in at least one health-promoting leadership behaviour sometimes or more frequently. Most respondents (79.0%) reported functioning at, or near, their best; 17.0% scored above cut-off on burnout, and 9.0% scored above cut-off on compassion fatigue. Self-care behaviours independently predicted professional well-being over time, and self-care attitudes indirectly predicted professional well-being through their influence on self-care behaviours. Health-promoting leadership independently predicted self-care behaviours and professional well-being over time. Discussion: Self-care behaviours are associated with better outcomes, and these behaviours are rooted in attitudes. Health-promoting leadership was directly correlated with less compassion fatigue and burnout. A productive self-care mindset and the right climate are critical for optimizing health care worker well-being in the military setting.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.364
Teacher spread0.321 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Military Veteran and Family HealthSame topicHealthcare professionals’ stress and burnoutFrench-language works237,207