MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4407395221 · doi:10.1139/cjb-2024-0047

Etiology of leaf blight of Chinese brush (<i>Baccharis conferta</i> Kunth) in Mexico

2025· article· en· W4407395221 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Alma Rosa Solano‐Báez, Alfonso D. Victoria Arellano, José Luis Trejo‐Espino, Gabriela Trejo‐Tapia, H. E. Flores-Moctezuma, Guillermo Márquez‐Licona

Bibliographic record

VenueBotany · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPlant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersInstituto Politécnico Nacional
KeywordsBiologyBaccharisBlightBotanyAsteraceae

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Bacchiaris conferta Kunth, a native plant used in traditional Mexican medicine, is now considered an important source for drug discovery and development, as it produces metabolites of pharmacological interest. In May 2022, leaf blight symptoms were observed in B. conferta plants growing in the Iztaccihuatl–Popocatepetl National Park. The disease incidence was 80%, while the severity was 12%. Diseased samples were collected to isolate the fungi associated with the disease . The recovered isolates were categorized by morphotypes, and a single isolate was randomly selected to be culturally and molecularly characterized, as well as to demonstrate its pathogenicity. According to the findings, the organisms responsible for leaf blight in wild B. conferta plants are Arcopilus cupreus (L.M. Ames) X. Wei Wang & Samson and Lophodermium pini-excelsae S. Ahmad. This is the first report of Arcopilus cupreus and Lophodermium pini-excelsae causing leaf blight in B. conferta plants.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.036

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBotany→Same topicPlant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases→French-language works237,207→