MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407397302 · doi:10.2514/6.2025-2789

Analytical Modeling of Regression Rates in Lattice-Protrusion Augmented Hybrid Rocket Fuels

2025· article· en· W4407397302 on OpenAlexaff
Annapurna Basavaraju, J. Wong, Craig T. Johansen

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRocket and propulsion systems research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRegression analysisRegressionRocket (weapon)Lattice (music)Environmental scienceMaterials scienceComputer scienceAerospace engineeringStatisticsEngineeringMathematicsPhysicsAcousticsMachine learning

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Fuel sloughing, the detachment of un-combusted fuel fragments, poses a significant challenge in paraffin wax-based hybrid rockets, potentially leading to motor failure. The current work aims to reduce sloughing by improving the mechanical properties of the fuel by embedding 3D-printed PLA lattices within the fuel grain. Protrusions made from thermal shock-resistant materials are also incorporated into the fuel grain to enhance regression rates by creating recirculation flows. A one-dimensional analytical model is developed to predict the regression rates of the lattice-augmented fuel grain with protrusion. The developed model is validated through experimental investigations using a slab burner. Regression rates of lattice-augmented fuel grains were measured with lattice volume fractions ranging from 5% to 25%. The results reveal that the model performs reasonably well at predicting the modest decrease in regression rate with increasing lattice volume fraction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.792
Threshold uncertainty score0.346

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.328
Teacher spread0.294 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRocket and propulsion systems researchFrench-language works237,207