MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407397921 · doi:10.1016/j.chstcc.2025.100138

Carotid Artery Corrected Flow Time Measured by Wearable Doppler Ultrasound Detects Stroke Volume Change Measured by Transesophageal Echocardiography After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

2025· article· en· W4407397921 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Jon‐Émile S. Kenny, Geoffrey D. Clarke, Sarah Atwi, Isabel Kerrebijn, Tracy Savery, Meredith Knott, Chelsea E. Munding, Mai Elfarnawany, Andrew M. Eibl, Joseph K. Eibl, Bhanu Nalla, Rony Atoui

Bibliographic record

VenueCHEST Critical Care · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNorthern Ontario Academic Medicine Association
KeywordsCardiologyMedicineInternal medicineBypass graftingArteryStroke volumeCarotid arteriesDoppler effectStroke (engine)RadiologyHeart ratePhysicsBlood pressure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: As a measure of preload responsiveness (PR), change in carotid artery corrected flow time (ccFTΔ) is a surrogate for change in stroke volume (SVΔ). However, the optimal threshold and accuracy of ccFTΔ to detect SVΔ are inconsistent in previous reports. Research Question: Does ccFTΔ from a wireless, wearable Doppler ultrasound accurately detect a 10% SVΔ measured by transesophageal echocardiography? Study Design and Methods: This was a prospective, single-center study of adult patients after elective coronary artery bypass grafting. PR was defined as ≥ 10% augmentation in transesophageal echocardiography left ventricular outflow tract velocity time integral (as a surrogate for SVΔ) during Trendelenburg positioning. Synchronous carotid Doppler imaging was captured by a wireless, wearable Doppler ultrasound. The optimal ccFTΔ threshold to detect PR, sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) were calculated. Linear correlation between ccFTΔ and SVΔ was assessed by Pearson correlation coefficient. We also evaluated the effect of the number of consecutively averaged cardiac cycles on ccFTΔ accuracy. Results: This analysis included 30 patients; 7 patients showed a ≥ 10% SVΔ during Trendelenburg positioning. The optimal ccFTΔ thresholds were +6.6 ms or 2.2% with sensitivities of 100%, specificities of 70%, and AUCs of 0.89 and 0.88, respectively. A strong, linear correlation between ccFTΔ and SVΔ was found (r = 0.70; P < .001). The mean AUC increased from 0.68 to 0.87 when using 1 vs 20 consecutively averaged cardiac cycles. Interpretation: After cardiopulmonary bypass, ccFTΔ measured by wireless, wearable ultrasound detected SVΔ during Trendelenburg positioning with high accuracy. The AUC improved as a function of consecutively averaged cardiac cycles. As a surrogate for preload-induced SVΔ, ccFTΔ can direct fluid therapy in the postoperative period.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.415
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCHEST Critical CareSame topicCardiovascular Health and Disease PreventionFrench-language works237,207