MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Comment on egusphere-2024-3696

2025· peer-review· en· W4407399005 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepeer-review
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeophysics and Gravity Measurements
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaFisheries and Oceans Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract. Marine heatwaves (MHWs) are becoming longer, more frequent and more intense in recent decades. MHWs have caused large-scale ecological impacts, such as coral bleaching, mass mortality of seagrass, fishes and invertebrates, and shifts in abundance and distribution of marine species. However, the implications of these MHW-induced impacts on marine species for the structure and functioning of marine food webs are not clearly understood. In this study, we use the EcoTroph-Dyn ecosystem modelling approach to examine the impacts of MHWs occurring during the year's warmest month on the trophodynamics of marine ecosystems. EcoTroph-Dyn represents marine ecosystem dynamics at a spatial resolution of 1° longitude by 1° latitude and a temporal resolution of 14 days. We applied the model to simulate changes in trophodynamic processes, energy transfer and ecosystem biomass using daily temperature and monthly net primary production (NPP) that were derived from satellite observation from 1998 to 2021. We compared and contrasted the simulated changes in biomass by trophic levels with results generated from temperature and NPP time series that had been filtered to remove MHWs. Our results show a significant decline in biomass between 1998 and 2021 specifically caused by MHWs. For example, in the Northeast Pacific Ocean, our model simulated a specific MHW decline in biomass of 8.7 % ± 1.0 (standard error) in the region from 2013 to 2016. Overall, MHW-induced biomass declines are more pronounced in the northern hemisphere and Pacific Ocean. Moreover, the MHW-induced declines in high trophic level biomass were larger than lower trophic levels and lasted longer post-MHW. Finally, this study highlights the need to integrate MHWs into modelling the effects of climate change on marine ecosystems. It shows that the EcoTroph approach, and especially its new dynamic version, provides a framework to understand more comprehensively the implications of climate change for marine ecosystem structure and functioning.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.456
Threshold uncertainty score0.777

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0150.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.4560.278

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeophysics and Gravity MeasurementsFrench-language works237,207