MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407405445 · doi:10.14745/ccdr.v51i23a04

Summary of the mpox outbreak in Canada, April 28−December 31, 2022

2025· article· en· W4407405445 on OpenAlexafffundvenueabout
Meera Bhulabhai, Jeyasakthi Venugopal, Mireille Plamondon, Geneviève Bergeron, Geneviève Cadieux, Jesse Kancir, Mayank Singal, Katherine Twohig, Austin Zygmunt, Erin Schillberg, Rukshanda Ahmad, Julia Paul

Bibliographic record

VenueCanada Communicable Disease Report · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicPoxvirus research and outbreaks
Canadian institutionsPublic Health OntarioBC Centre for Disease ControlNova Scotia Health AuthorityPublic Health Agency of Canada
FundersBritish Columbia Centre for Disease ControlPublic Health AgencyPublic Health Agency of Canada
KeywordsPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Mpox is an infectious disease caused by the monkeypox virus (MPXV), closely related to the virus that causes smallpox. In May 2022, cases of mpox were reported in previously non-endemic countries including Canada. Objective: To summarize the epidemiology of the mpox outbreak in Canada, as well as key public health response activities, between April and December 2022. Methods: The Public Health Agency of Canada (PHAC) worked closely with local, provincial and territorial public health authorities to develop national case investigation and reporting tools, including national case definitions for confirmed and probable mpox cases. Based on de-identified case data submitted to PHAC, patterns and trends were examined, including the distribution of cases by sociodemographic, clinical and transmission factors. Results: Overall, 1,474 mpox cases (1,396 confirmed, 78 probable) were reported to PHAC. All reported cases were associated with MPXV clade IIb. Mpox disproportionately affected gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men (80.0%) and those between 20-49 years of age (86.0%). Available data suggests that the most likely mode of disease acquisition was through sexual contact, with limited evidence on other possible modes of transmission. Some cases were hospitalized (3.0%); however, there were no mpox-related deaths in Canada. Conclusion: Rapid coordination and surveillance activities supported the timely implementation of tailored interventions, including the procurement and distribution of vaccines. These actions, coupled with vaccination uptake and behavioural changes, contributed to reducing transmission and health impacts of mpox on the Canadian population.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.043
Threshold uncertainty score0.314

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.005
Science and technology studies0.0030.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes4
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanada Communicable Disease ReportSame topicPoxvirus research and outbreaksFrench-language works237,207