MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407406247 · doi:10.1016/j.jtct.2025.01.891

Pediatric Transplant and Cellular Therapy Consortium RESILIENT Conference on Pediatric Chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease Survivorship after Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation: Part III. Long-Term Impact of Chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease on Endocrinologic, Cardiovascular, and Metabolic Outcomes in Survivors of Pediatric Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation

2025· article· en· W4407406247 on OpenAlexaff
Pooja Khandelwalhl, Jonathan D. Fish, Lev Gorfinkel, Gregory M.T. Guilcher, Jonathan C. Howell, Miki Nishitani, Brandon Nuechterlein, Esther A. Obeng, Ami J. Shah, Geoff D.E. Cuvelier, Seth J. Rotz, Kirsten M. Williams

Bibliographic record

VenueTransplantation and Cellular Therapy · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
Canadian institutionsAlberta Children's HospitalUniversity of Calgary
FundersNHLBI Division of Intramural ResearchNational Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
KeywordsHematopoietic cellMedicineHematopoietic stem cell transplantationGraft-versus-host diseaseSurvivorship curveDiseaseTransplantationHaematopoiesisPediatricsIntensive care medicineStem cellInternal medicineCancerBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) has a profound impact on the endocrinologic and cardiovascular health of survivors of transplantation performed in childhood. The impact of cGVHD is long-lasting and contributes to morbidity and early mortality through multiple mechanisms. Organs and tissues may be direct targets of alloreactive donor-derived immune cells. Corticosteroids and other cGVHD-directed therapies influence hormonal actions, alter bone metabolism, and negatively impact cardiometabolic health. Pediatric survivors are particularly vulnerable to the endocrinologic and cardiovascular effects of cGVHD as it develops during periods of intense growth and development, although little is known about the direct contribution to late effects. The Research and Education Toward Solutions for Late Effects to Innovate, Excel, and Nurture after cGVHD (RESILIENT after cGVHD) effort brought together content experts to determine the state of the science, develop clinical recommendations, and propose a research agenda in endocrine, cardiovascular, and metabolic cGVHD survivorship, which are detailed in this report.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.020
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.105

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0200.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0040.005
Research integrity0.0080.009
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueTransplantation and Cellular TherapySame topicHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationFrench-language works237,207