MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407409663 · doi:10.3390/math13040590

Inference for Two-Parameter Birnbaum–Saunders Distribution Based on Type-II Censored Data with Application to the Fatigue Life of Aluminum Coupon Cuts

2025· article· en· W4407409663 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueMathematics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicStatistical Distribution Estimation and Applications
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversityMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCouponInferenceType (biology)StatisticsEconometricsDistribution (mathematics)Maximum likelihoodMathematicsComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceEconomicsMathematical analysisGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study addresses the problem of parameter estimation and prediction for type-II censored data from the two-parameter Birnbaum–Saunders (BS) distribution. The BS distribution is commonly used in reliability analysis, particularly in modeling fatigue life. Accurate estimation and prediction are crucial in many fields where censored data frequently appear, such as material science, medical studies and industrial applications. This paper presents both frequentist and Bayesian approaches to estimate the shape and scale parameters of the BS distribution, along with the prediction of unobserved failure times. Random data are generated from the BS distribution under type-II censoring, where a pre-specified number of failures (m) is observed. The generated data are used to calculate the Maximum Likelihood Estimation (MLE) and Bayesian inference and evaluate their performances. The Bayesian method employs Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) sampling for point predictions and credible intervals. We apply the methods to both datasets generated under type-II censoring and real-world data on the fatigue life of 6061-T6 aluminum coupons. Although the results show that the two methods yield similar parameter estimates, the Bayesian approach offers more flexible and reliable prediction intervals. Extensive R codes are used to explain the practical application of these methods. Our findings confirm the advantages of Bayesian inference in handling censored data, especially when prior information is available for estimation. This work not only supports the theoretical understanding of the BS distribution under type-II censoring but also provides practical tools for analyzing real data in reliability and survival studies. Future research will discuss extensions of these methods to the multi-sample progressive censoring model with larger datasets and the integration of degradation models commonly encountered in industrial applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.901
Threshold uncertainty score0.575

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.099
GPT teacher head0.400
Teacher spread0.301 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it