MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407411432 · doi:10.2514/6.2025-1373

Data Oriented Simulation Framework in a Decentralized and Asymmetric HPC Ecosystem

2025· article· en· W4407411432 on OpenAlexaff
Marc Poinot, Julien Mayeur, Grégory Hannebique

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicDistributed and Parallel Computing Systems
Canadian institutionsSafran Electronics (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceEcosystemDistributed computingData modelingSoftware engineeringEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The MOSAIC lightweight framework is a SAFRAN middleware targeting data management in an infrastructure including HPC facilities. In this paper we show how using a data oriented paradigm allows us to speed up simulation workflows and reduce the overall footprint of files, taking advantages of storage and computational resources availability within a large network of HPC infrastructure. Rather than defining a process consuming and producing data all along its run, we declare dependencies between existing and expected data and we let the system find the right production graph. This allows a makefile-like behavior of session following a workflow, trying to find actual data, fetching and using existing data matching the requirements or producing only those missing. The dependencies analysis is used to find potentially independent parts of the workflows to be run in parallel or to find which is the best workflow to select to obtain the expected final data. The dependency definition is formalized as a database query, this defines the set of accepted candidates as data source or product. Each data of the system has a set of qualifications, a query would look for existing data matching these qualifications and if found would eventually transfer it to the expected location for use. Definitions of data requirements and their relationships are specified in a profile. As these requirement are set of characteristics and not types, the users can define as many profiles they want. We have then different views of the same data, making it possible to have asymmetric understanding of a shared parts of large simulation processes. We have a lightweight representations of file contents, so-called datasets, which have qualifications describing key contents with predefined keywords. Some of these keywords can be generated automatically, for example when the file of the dataset is compliant to a standard like CGNS and it is easier to find key characteristics of the data. A Dataset refers to files but does not embed files, which means some production has been achieved, or no files, which means the dataset has files somewhere else on the network or is waiting for being produced. These datasets are duplicated in multiple databases across a network with multiple storage and computation resources. The framework is in charge of interpreting the data request all over the network and insure a lazy file transfer if required in a concurrency environment. On an HPC system this dramatically reduces the redundancy of files and the actual wall clock time of complex workflow executions. At the end of this paper, we illustrate the use and the performance of such a data oriented system on actual simulation workflows.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.969
Threshold uncertainty score0.382

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.317
Teacher spread0.290 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicDistributed and Parallel Computing SystemsFrench-language works237,207