MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407416242 · doi:10.2514/6.2025-0180

Shape Reconstruction Of Unknown Tumbling Target Using Factor Graph-Based Dynamic SLAM

2025· article· en· W4407416242 on OpenAlex
El Ghali Asri, Zheng Zhu

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRobotics and Sensor-Based Localization
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFactor graphComputer scienceSimultaneous localization and mappingArtificial intelligenceGraphFactor (programming language)Computer visionPattern recognition (psychology)AlgorithmRobotMobile robotTheoretical computer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

On Orbit Servicing (OOS) is increasingly vital in modern space missions, encompassing satellite maintenance, orbital assembly, and debris removal. Within this scope, servicing spacecraft must first inspect and characterize their target before initiation of any servicing actions. This paper introduces a navigation algorithm designed to reconstruct the shape of unknown space objects using a factor graph-based Simultaneous Localization and Mapping (SLAM) formulation, drawing on observed and identified point cloud features. The algorithm employs batch optimizations of collected measurements to facilitate real-time mapping of the target object. In addition, the space object is assumed to be tumbling which directly challenges the static environment assumption prevalent in most SLAM formulations. To address this, a dynamic SLAM formulation is leveraged, and a noisy parametric model is used to propagate the dynamic map as well as to construct the dynamic factor-graph at front-end level. Loop closures of previously seen features as they rotate and evolve with the target object are possible with the incorporation of kinematic factors. The latter’s store current available estimation of the dynamic model parameters and link consecutive landmark nodes in the factor graph thus closing the loop and enhancing the robustness and accuracy of the mapping process. Besides showing that the estimated point cloud map converges to the true map after a few iterations of batch factor graph optimizations in the static case first. The results also show that the use of a dynamic model allows to track the evolution of the map in the dynamic case and that the estimated dynamic map error is further reduced when using kinematic factors to close the loops. This method demonstrates promising prospects for equipping servicing spacecraft with advanced, modern, and robust perception intelligence for inspecting unknown target objects in orbit

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.557
Threshold uncertainty score0.456

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRobotics and Sensor-Based LocalizationFrench-language works237,207