MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407416641 · doi:10.1039/d4su00193a

Studies on poly(butylene succinate) and poly(butylene succinate-<i>co</i>-adipate)-based biodegradable plastics for sustainable flexible packaging and agricultural applications: a comprehensive review

2025· review· en· W4407416641 on OpenAlexafffund
Debarshi Nath, Manjusri Misra, Fadi Al-Daoud, Amar K. Mohanty

Bibliographic record

VenueRSC Sustainability · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
Topicbiodegradable polymer synthesis and properties
Canadian institutionsMinistry of Agriculture, Food and Rural AffairsUniversity of Guelph
FundersFedDev OntarioCanada Foundation for InnovationUniversity of GuelphMinistry of Colleges and UniversitiesNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaOntario Agri-Food Innovation Alliance
KeywordsPolybutylene succinateAdipateMaterials sciencePolymer sciencePolymer chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PBS and PBSA can be used to manufacture cost-effective and sustainable materials for applications in food packaging and agriculture.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.340
Teacher spread0.296 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations48
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRSC SustainabilitySame topicbiodegradable polymer synthesis and propertiesFrench-language works237,207