MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407424808 · doi:10.1016/j.tbs.2025.100996

Quantifying physical activity during active commuting to school: A comparison of methodologies

2025· article· en· W4407424808 on OpenAlexaff
Pablo Campos‐Garzón, Amador Lara-Sánchez, Ana Queralt, Jasper Schipperijn, Tom Stewart, Yaira Barranco-Ruíz, Palma Chillón, Jairo H. Migueles

Bibliographic record

VenueTravel Behaviour and Society · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicUrban Transport and Accessibility
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Lethbridge
FundersConsejería de Conocimiento, Investigación y Universidad, Junta de AndalucíaJunta de AndalucíaMinisterio de Economía y CompetitividadMinisterio de Asuntos Económicos y Transformación Digital, Gobierno de EspañaUniversidad de GranadaMinisterio de Ciencia e InnovaciónEuropean Regional Development FundFederación Española de Enfermedades Raras
KeywordsPhysical activityPoison controlHuman factors and ergonomicsInjury preventionTransport engineeringEnvironmental healthEnvironmental sciencePsychologyForensic engineeringEngineeringMedicinePhysical medicine and rehabilitation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

• Accurate identification of start/end times is crucial for measuring physical activity during commuting accurately. • Common interval times may overestimate sedentary time and light physical activity during commuting. • Our proposed method, based on the distance from home to school, performed as well as GPS. The current study aims to detect walking trips to/from school with different methodologies (GPS, self-reported, fixed windows [w30 and w60], and distance-based time), and to compare the start/end times for the trips, and the time accumulated in sedentary time, light physical activity (LPA), and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA). A total of 93 Spanish adolescents wore an accelerometer and GPS during school days, and the start/end times of walking trips to/from school were determined using five different methodologies. Mixed-effects limits of agreement analyses were used to determine the level of agreement between the start/end times of the walking trips identified by the five methodologies mentioned. Moreover, methodologies were determined to be equivalent if the mean difference with the GPS was within the proposed equivalence zone of ± 5.0 min. Self-reported measures showed a good level of agreement for estimating start times of walking trips to school compared to GPS, 0.0 (LoA95%:-0.3–0.2) hours. Self-reported measures were deemed equivalent to GPS for measuring sedentary time, LPA, and MVPA. W30 and distance-based time were equivalent to GPS for LPA and MVPA, but not for sedentary time. W60 was only deemed equivalent to GPS for MVPA accumulated during walking trips to and from school. Self-reported measures showed the most precise approach for estimating start times to school, as well as it deemed equivalent to GPS for quantifying sedentary time, LPA, and MVPA. Moreover, estimating the time to complete the trip based on the distance between home and school could be more appropriate than fixed windows.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.018
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.027
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.094

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0180.027
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.168
GPT teacher head0.460
Teacher spread0.291 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTravel Behaviour and SocietySame topicUrban Transport and AccessibilityFrench-language works237,207