MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407425632 · doi:10.1016/j.spl.2025.110379

The oracle property of the generalized outcome-adaptive lasso

2025· article· en· W4407425632 on OpenAlexafffund
Ismaïla Baldé

Bibliographic record

VenueStatistics & Probability Letters · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicStatistical Methods and Inference
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Moncton
FundersNew Brunswick Innovation Foundation
KeywordsMathematicsLasso (programming language)Property (philosophy)Outcome (game theory)OracleApplied mathematicsEconometricsCalculus (dental)StatisticsMathematical economicsMedicineComputer scienceEpistemology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The generalized outcome-adaptive lasso (GOAL) is a variable selection for high-dimensional causal inference proposed by Baldé et al. (2023). When the dimension is high, it is now well established that an ideal variable selection method should have the oracle property to ensure the optimal large sample performance. However, the oracle property of GOAL has not been proven. In this paper, we show that the GOAL estimator enjoys the oracle property. Our simulation shows that the GOAL method deals with the collinearity problem better than the oracle-like method, the outcome-adaptive lasso (OAL).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.040
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.046

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.040
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.004
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0020.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.088
GPT teacher head0.362
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStatistics & Probability LettersSame topicStatistical Methods and InferenceFrench-language works237,207