Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Multiparametric study of a thrust force exerted on a model electric (E) sail spacecraft by the solar wind is conducted with a particle-in-cell method. Several effects relevant to the thrust performance are examined with the focus on the accuracy of the obtained results, reflected in the improved initial conditions and physically realistic boundary conditions set at the external boundaries and the near field of a tether. These effects include thrust sensitivity to the solar wind density, temperature, and relative velocity between the solar wind and the spacecraft as well as the influence of the tether potential on the resulting thrust force. The dependence of thrust [Formula: see text] on the distance between the spacecraft and the sun [Formula: see text] is found to have an exponential form approximated by [Formula: see text]. Numerical estimates of the electric current to the E-sail tether mesh give values that are on average about 50% higher than those predicted by the orbital motion limited theory. In addition to single tethers, tether arrays are also studied and shown to have lower thrust per tether that that of a single tether.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it