MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407426013 · doi:10.1016/j.jag.2025.104401

3D-UMamba: 3D U-Net with state space model for semantic segmentation of multi-source LiDAR point clouds

2025· article· en· W4407426013 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Dening Lu, Linlin Xu, Jun Zhou, Kyle Gao, Zheng Gong, Dedong Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
Topic3D Shape Modeling and Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaChina Scholarship Council
KeywordsPoint cloudLidarSegmentationNet (polyhedron)GeographySpace (punctuation)Remote sensingPoint (geometry)State (computer science)CartographyComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceAlgorithmGeometryMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Segmentation of point clouds is foundational to numerous remote sensing applications. Recently, the development of Transformers has further improved segmentation techniques thanks to their great long-range context modeling capability. However, Transformers have quadratic complexity in inference time and memory, which both limits the input size and poses a strict hardware requirement. This paper presents a novel 3D-UMamba network with linear complexity, which is the earliest to introduce the Selective State Space Model (i.e., Mamba) to multi-source LiDAR point cloud processing. 3D-UMamba integrates Mamba into the classic U-Net architecture, presenting outstanding global context modeling with high efficiency and achieving an effective combination of local and global information. In addition, we propose a simple yet efficient 3D-token serialization approach (Voxel-based Token Serialization, i.e., VTS) for Mamba, where the Bi-Scanning strategy enables the model to collect features from all input points in different directions effectively. The performance of 3D-UMamba on three challenging LiDAR point cloud datasets (airborne MultiSpectral LiDAR (MS-LiDAR), aerial DALES, and vehicle-mounted Toronto-3D) demonstrated its superiority in multi-source LiDAR point cloud semantic segmentation, as well as the strong adaptability of Mamba to different types of LiDAR data, exceeding current state-of-the-art models. Ablation studies demonstrated the higher efficiency and lower memory costs of 3D-UMamba than its Transformer-based counterparts. • Proposing a new Mamba-based LiDAR point cloud segmentation framework, 3D-UMamba. • Designing a novel Voxel-based Token Serialization method with a Bi-Scanning strategy. • Experiments demonstrated the SOTA performance of Mamba in multi-source LiDAR data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.605
Threshold uncertainty score0.403

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Applied Earth Observation and GeoinformationSame topic3D Shape Modeling and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207