MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407429914 · doi:10.23977/jeis.2025.100101

Underwater Monocular-continuous Stereo Network Based on Cascade Structure for Underwater Image Depth Estimation

2025· article· en· W4407429914 on OpenAlexvenueno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Electronics and Information Science · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Vision and Imaging
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsUnderwaterCascadeMonocularArtificial intelligenceComputer visionStereo imageComputer scienceGeologyImage (mathematics)EngineeringOceanography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Underwater monocular image depth estimation (UMIDE) is crucial accurately representing and understanding underwater spatial variations, which can significantly enhance applications such as ocean engineering construction and seabed resource exploration. However, UMIDE frequently suffers from isolated discontinuous irregular "spots", inaccurate or indistinguishable edges, and limited model generalization, resulting from color distortion, image blurring, and spatial information loss. This paper proposes an underwater Monocular-continuous stereo network based on a cascade structure (UMCS-CS). Initially, we design a Pinhole model-based Structure from Motion method for camera pose estimation. UMCS-CS employs a two-stage structure for feature extraction: the first stage extracts global information, and the second stage captures detailed information using the squeeze–excitation block with spatial and channel attention. For isolated, discontinuous, and irregular "spots", we use the variance of the current depth estimation to adjust and appropriately expand the depth estimation range. We design a composite loss function, which is a combination of the smooth L1 loss, edge loss function, structural similarity loss, and smoothness loss functions, each with different weights. Experiments on public underwater datasets show that the relative error of the estimated depth map is reduced by 60.83%, the root mean square error by 54.87%, and the logarithmic error by 39.61%.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.784
Threshold uncertainty score0.650

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.007
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Electronics and Information ScienceSame topicAdvanced Vision and ImagingFrench-language works237,207