MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407437280 · doi:10.1101/2025.02.11.25322103

Statistical Analysis Plan for the manuscript reporting the primary outcome of the MSU-TELEMED study

2025· preprint· en· W4407437280 on OpenAlexaff
Leonid Churilov, Hannah Johns, Vignan Yogendrakumar, Anna Balabanski

Bibliographic record

VenuemedRxiv · 2025
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicDelphi Technique in Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOutcome (game theory)Plan (archaeology)Primary (astronomy)BusinessHistoryEconomicsArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This manuscript describes the Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP) for the following study: Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Telemedicine Physician Assessments on a Mobile Stroke Unit: a Prospective Open-Label Blinded End-Point Randomized Controlled Trial (MSU-TELEMED) This document is a supplement to the MSU-TELEMED study protocol and contains the statistical analysis plan (SAP) for the main paper of the trial in which the primary outcome will be reported. This document complies with the guidelines for the content of statistical analysis plans in clinical trials

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.123
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.380
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Protocol · Consensus signal: Protocol
Teacher disagreement score0.327
Threshold uncertainty score0.960

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.1230.380
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0040.003
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0080.006
Bibliometrics0.0070.010
Science and technology studies0.0020.005
Scholarly communication0.0050.003
Open science0.0030.003
Research integrity0.0050.010
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.3270.087

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.293
GPT teacher head0.502
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreProtocol

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuemedRxivSame topicDelphi Technique in ResearchFrench-language works237,207