MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407448828 · doi:10.1109/ojcoms.2025.3541962

Handover Strategy for LEO Satellite Networks Using Bipartite Graph and Hysteresis Margin

2025· article· en· W4407448828 on OpenAlexaff
Sahar Eydian, Maryam Hosseini, Güneş Karabulut Kurt

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Open Journal of the Communications Society · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSatellite Communication Systems
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBipartite graphMargin (machine learning)HandoverComputer scienceSatelliteGraphComputer networkTheoretical computer scienceEngineeringAerospace engineeringMachine learning

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The low Earth orbit (LEO) satellite constellation has become a highly effective solution for non-terrestrial networks (NTN), offering reliable, uninterrupted, and high-speed global communication. However, the rapid movement of LEO satellites results in a significant handover rate across satellites. Therefore, satellite handover management is essential to ensure the stability and continuity of communication services. This paper proposes a novel weighted bipartite graph-based handover strategy in LEO constellations to enhance quality of service (QoS) and overcome the challenge of frequent satellite handovers. The proposed approach utilizes the Kuhn-Munkres (KM) algorithm to achieve optimal matching with maximum weight, thereby ensuring efficient load distribution and high-quality communication. Moreover, the implementation of hysteresis margin (HM) reduces unnecessary handovers and thus enhances the overall performance of the network. The numerical results demonstrate a significant reduction in handover rate and latency, while improving energy efficiency and achieving enhanced data rates. In particular, our scheme effectively adapts to varying Rician K-factors and demonstrates flexibility under different signal conditions. Furthermore, the obtained results highlight a significant reduction in handover costs and ensure efficient and reliable communication in LEO satellite networks.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.742
Threshold uncertainty score0.539

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0030.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.107
GPT teacher head0.347
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Open Journal of the Communications SocietySame topicSatellite Communication SystemsFrench-language works237,207