Spectrum Sharing in Internet-of-Vehicles Networks: Digital Twin-Empowered Proactive Interference Management Approach
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Internet-of-Vehicles (IoV) is envisioned to connect vehicles with each other, the surrounding environment, and central control centers. Spectrum sharing among active vehicular links is imperative to enhance the utilization of the spectrum licensed to IoV networks. However, co-channel interference among neighboring vehicular communication links poses a fundamental challenge when enabling spectrum sharing in IoV networks. This paper introduces a resource optimization framework, entitled PRISM (ProactiveResource optimization forInterference andSpectrumManagement), to mitigate co-channel interference in IoV networks. PRISM proactively allocates resources among a set of Vehicle-to-Infrastructure (V2I) communication links by accurately predicting the links’ positions and multi-path channel gains, thereby preventing outdated resource scheduling in dynamic IoV networks. PRISM is a three-step approach. In the first step, a multi-layer long short-term memory neural network and transfer learning are employed to predict the vehicles’ positions. In the second step, a digital twin network incorporating high-fidelity 3D maps and a ray tracing tool entitled$\mathrm {Sionna}^{\textrm {TM}}$is used to predict the V2I links’ multi-path channel gains. In the third step, a resource allocation algorithm is executed to efficiently determine V2I clusters and their transmit power allocations to maximize the overall system capacity. Simulation results show that PRISM enhances IoV network’s capacity up to 33% compared to non-proactive schemes, as validated through a simulation framework using real-world vehicular mobility traces.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".