MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407454739 · doi:10.5539/ijef.v17n3p40

Determinants of Price Dynamics in African Countries

2025· article· en· W4407454739 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Thomas Niyonzima Gahamanyi, Gérard Tchouassi

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Economics and Finance · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicEconomic Growth and Development
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDynamics (music)EconomicsEconometricsSociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study analyzes the different determinants of price dynamics in Africa. We employed Bayesian Model Averaging to shed light on the primary determinants of price dynamics while taking into account the uncertainty associated with model design. Data was collected on 51 (Note 1) African countries for the chosen period from 1980-2020. The findings show that price dynamics in Africa are explained by various factors; the prices of imported foodstuffs, the production gap, government efficiency, the rule of law, English origin, and distance from the sea have a positive effect on price dynamics. Conversely, the interest rate, gold prices, millet supply, the budget balance rule, political stability and absence of violence, corruption control, and rural population have a negative effect on price dynamics in Africa. We urge the African governments to alleviate inflationary pressures and foster a more stable and prosperous economic environment for their citizens. Thus, monetary policy plays a crucial role in managing inflation in Africa. The establishment of an observatory of price dynamics is a solution to maintaining and controlling inflation in African countries.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Economics and FinanceSame topicEconomic Growth and DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207