MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Artificial neural network chemistry solving for high-pressure hydrogen–air combustion

2025· article· en· W4407456739 on OpenAlexaff
Ada Béroudiaux, Luc Vervisch, Pascale Domingo

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Hydrogen Energy · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicCombustion and flame dynamics
Canadian institutionsSafran Electronics (Canada)
FundersAssociation Nationale de la Recherche et de la Technologie
KeywordsArtificial neural networkCombustionHydrogenHigh pressureChemistryProcess engineeringComputer scienceEnvironmental scienceChemical engineeringArtificial intelligenceEngineering physicsEngineeringPhysical chemistryOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The simulation of the time evolution of chemical species in hydrogen flames by artificial neural networks (ANN) is discussed for operating conditions representative of aeronautical combustion chambers, e.g., above the atmospheric pressure, in the presence of recirculating burnt gases and secondary air-dilution. This machine learning strategy aims at replacing the integration of ordinary differential equations for the computation of chemical source terms, which can be costly, particularly at high-pressure conditions. The training database is obtained from a population of stochastic particles undergoing turbulent micro-mixing and chemical reactions. The ANN performance is then validated a posteriori on the same micro-mixing canonical problem, replacing the chemistry integration with the ANN regression. Various operating conditions are addressed in terms of global fuel/air ratio, dilution by cooling air, and burnt gases, at 1 bar and 20 bars pressure levels. Two chemical schemes are employed: a 9-species mechanism for H 2 chemistry and a 15-species mechanism containing a reduced NOx sub-mechanism. Various neural network training methodologies from the literature are tested and compared. It is found that the most effective strategies lie in data addition, underlying the importance of the database in ANN training procedures. Furthermore, existing methodologies fail when accounting for NOx chemistry. An alternative network architecture and training method are therefore proposed and tested. The accurate monitoring of atomic mass conservation is also addressed. • The time integration by neural networks of stiff H 2 -air chemical systems is studied. • A strategy is discussed to build training databases for conditions representative of aeronautical combustion chambers. • Three different methodologies are evaluated to organize the database and the neural networks architecture. • The influence on the network accuracy of the background pressure (from 1 to 20 bars) is examined. • A methodology is proposed to predict with neural networks both the major and intermediate species, including NOx.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.165
Threshold uncertainty score0.639

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Hydrogen EnergySame topicCombustion and flame dynamicsFrench-language works237,207