A Hybrid Data-Driven Granular Model for Battery Remaining Useful Life Prediction
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Accurate and meaningful prediction of the remaining useful life (RUL) of lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) provides a significant guide for the maintenance and management of these LIBs. A singular numerical predictive result by numerous conventional models is insufficient to furnish decision-makers with comprehensive or nuanced insights. To address this issue, predictive RUL results in the form of information granules are essential. In this study, a hybrid data-driven granular model is established for battery RUL prediction with granular (interval-based) quantification for LIBs. This granular model is designed and formulated in a way that it produces comprehensive prediction outcomes realized as information granules, which are expressed in a more descriptive and comprehensive manner. Thus, the resulting information granules can effectively reflect and communicate the confidence associated with the predictions. The granular model is realized in two steps: 1) probabilistic prediction results are produced by a hybrid numeric predictive model and 2) a comprehensive granulation of the probabilistic results is achieved under the principle of information granularity. The granular predictive results are holistically evaluated and optimized by the two associated criteria of granularity (coverage and specificity). This transformation of information granules provides an intuitive and interpretable display for battery maintenance and safe work. The proposed granular model is verified by using an open-access LIBs dataset, and the experimental results demonstrate that the proposed granular model outperforms other comparative methods.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".