MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407465390 · doi:10.1055/s-0045-1802362

Endotheliales Ephrin-B2 beeinflusst die Widerstandsfähigkeit der Blut-Rückenmarksschranke in der akuten Phase nach traumatischer Rückenmarksverletzung

2025· article· de· W4407465390 on OpenAlexaff
Katharina Kersting, Laurens Roolfs, Emily J. Von Bronewski, Lilly Waldmann, Lüder Hinrich Meyer, Melina Nieminen-Kelhä, Irina Kremenetskaia, Adnan Ghori, André Rex, Ralf H. Adams, Frank L. Heppner, Michael G. Fehlings, Peter Vajkoczy, Vanessa Hubertus

Bibliographic record

VenueDie Wirbelsäule · 2025
Typearticle
Languagede
FieldMedicine
TopicSpinal Hematomas and Complications
Canadian institutionsToronto Western HospitalUniversity Health Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hintergrund: Die Verletzung der Blut-Rückenmarksschranke (BSCB) ist maßgeblich an der Pathophysiologie der traumatischen Rückenmarksverletzung (RMV) beteiligt. Wir konnten bereits zeigen, dass das Zell-Zell-Protein Ephrin-B2 speziell in Endothelzellen (EC) die pathologische Permeabilität der BSCB in der akuten Verletzungsphase verstärkt. Die zugrundeliegenden Mechanismen und die Auswirkungen im Langzeitmodell sind noch unbekannt. Ziel dieser Studie ist, den Einfluss von Ephrin-B2 in EC auf die strukturelle und zelluläre Integrität der BSCB sowie die neurologische Erholung nach traumatischer RMV in einem Maus-Modell bis in die chronische Phase zu untersuchen. Publication History Article published online: 13 February 2025 © 2025. Thieme. All rights reserved. Georg Thieme Verlag KG Oswald-Hesse-Straße 50, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.339
Teacher spread0.314 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueDie WirbelsäuleSame topicSpinal Hematomas and ComplicationsFrench-language works237,207