MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407465611 · doi:10.1093/tse/tdaf011

Light-resistant target detection improvement algorithm for overexposed environments

2025· article· en· W4407465611 on OpenAlexaff
Zheng Chen, Zhiwei Li, Sha Huang, Yanjia Zhao

Bibliographic record

VenueTransportation Safety and Environment · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicInfrared Target Detection Methodologies
Canadian institutionsMinistry of Education and Child Care
FundersNatural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province
KeywordsComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceAlgorithm

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract In strong light environments, images often appear overexposed, which seriously impacts the accuracy of target detection. Most existing research, however, requires additional modules to assist in detection, which affects the timeliness of the detection process. To address the issues of reduced target detection accuracy and timeliness in overexposed environments, this paper proposes a real-time anti-light target detection improvement algorithm based on you-only-look-once v8n (YOLO v8n), focusing on enhancing the model's ability to extract features from overexposed images without the need for additional modules. Firstly, online overexposure enhancement technology is integrated into model training to simulate overexposed images produced in overexposed environments, enhancing the model's robustness in detecting overexposed environments. Deformable convolution networks v2 is used to improve the cross-stage partial bottleneck with two convolutions layer, addressing the issue of traditional convolution's poor feature extraction performance for overexposed images, thereby aiding the model in capturing targets with weakened or missing features and enhancing the model's ability to construct the geometric shape of targets. Secondly, large separable kernel attention is introduced to enhance the spatial pyramid pooling fast layer, strengthening the model's overall connectivity for targets with missing features. Finally, distance intersection over union is utilized to optimize the detection accuracy of overlapping targets in overexposed environments. The experimental results show that, compared to the original model, the mAP50 and mAP50–95 of the model designed in this paper are improved by 23.2% and 15.7%, respectively, and the model size only increases by 0.3 M. While improving detection accuracy, the lightweight requirements for actual deployment are also met.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTransportation Safety and EnvironmentSame topicInfrared Target Detection MethodologiesFrench-language works237,207