Heart Rate and Body Temperature Relationship in Children Admitted to PICU: A Machine Learning Approach
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Vital signs are crucial clinical measures, with body temperature (BT) and heart rate (HR) being particularly significant. While their association has been studied in adults and children, research in Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU) settings remains limited despite the critical conditions of these patients. OBJECTIVE: This study examines the relationship between HR and BT in children aged 0 to 18 admitted to the PICU at CHU Sainte-Justine (CHUSJ) Hospital. METHODS: Machine learning (ML) techniques, including Gradient Boosting Machines (GBM) with Quantile Regression (QR), were applied to capture the relationship between HR, BT, and age, optimizing model performance through hyperparameter tuning. RESULTS: Analyzing data from 4006 children, we observed a consistent trend of decreasing HR with increasing age and rising HR with higher BT ranges. Linear models often underestimated HR at lower BT ranges and overestimated it at higher ranges, especially in younger age groups. The GBM model demonstrated improved accuracy and supported a user-friendly interface for HR predictions based on BT, age, and HR percentiles. Qualitative observations indicated that linear models underestimated HR at lower BT ranges and overestimated it at higher ones, particularly in younger children. These findings challenge the direct linear association assumed in prior studies. CONCLUSION: This study provides new insights into the non-linear dynamics between HR, BT, and age in critically ill children, emphasizing further research to quantify and understand these relationships. SIGNIFICANCE: By refining predictive models and re-evaluating traditional assumptions, this work provides valuable insights for improving clinical decision-making in PICU settings.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".