Attention Based Simple Primitives for Open-World Compositional Zero-Shot Learning
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Compositional Zero-Shot Learning (CZSL) aims to predict unknown compositions made up of attribute and object pairs. Predicting compositions unseen during training is a challenging task. We are exploring Open-World Compositional Zero Shot Learning (OW-CZSL) in this study, where our test space encompasses all potential combinations of attributes and objects. Our approach involves utilizing the self-attention mechanism between attributes and objects to achieve better generalization from seen to unseen compositions. Utilizing a self-attention mechanism facilitates the model's ability to identify relationships between attribute and objects. The similarity between the self-attended textual and visual features is subsequently calculated to generate predictions during the inference phase. The potential test space may encompass implausible object-attribute combinations arising from unrestricted attribute-object pairings. To mitigate this issue, we leverage external knowledge from ConceptNet to restrict the test space to realistic compositions. Our proposed model, Attention-based Simple Primitives (ASP), demonstrates competitive performance, achieving results comparable to the state-of-the-art. Code is available at https://github.com/ans92/ASP.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".