MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Efficiency and Bandwidth Improvement of Digitally-Assisted LMBAs Using Adaptive Input Power Distribution

2024· article· en· W4407476882 on OpenAlexaff
Mohammad Hossein Khazani, Fadhel M. Ghannouchi, Wenhua Chen, Mohamed Helaoui

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicInterconnection Networks and Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBandwidth (computing)Computer sciencePower (physics)Electronic engineeringTelecommunicationsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper introduces a frequency-dependent power-splitting technique to enhance power-added efficiency (PAE) and bandwidth in digitally-assisted load-modulated balanced amplifiers (LMBAs). The splitting function for the injection signal is optimized using a Genetic Algorithm (NSGA-II) based on modulated signal measurements within the LMBA's 3-dB bandwidth. Testing with two QPA2935 amplifiers shows a nearly 140 MHz bandwidth extension with no loss in linearity or efficiency. PAE improvement varies across the bandwidth, reaching over 15%. Assessment with a 50 MHz 64-QAM signal shows PAE improvements of 14.85% and 4.79% at 3.025 and 3.525 GHz, respectively, with significant frequency response flatness.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.990
Threshold uncertainty score0.283

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicInterconnection Networks and SystemsFrench-language works237,207