Comprehensive dissection of cis-regulatory elements in a 2.8 Mb topologically associated domain in six human cancers
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cis-regulatory elements (CREs), such as enhancers and promoters, are fundamental regulators of gene expression and, across different cell types, the MYC locus utilizes a diverse regulatory architecture driven by multiple CREs. To better understand differences in CRE function, we perform pooled CRISPR inhibition (CRISPRi) screens to comprehensively probe the 2.8 Mb topologically-associated domain containing MYC in 6 human cancer cell lines with nucleotide resolution. We map 32 CREs where inhibition leads to changes in cell growth, including 8 that overlap previously identified enhancers. Targeting specific CREs decreases MYC expression by as much as 60%, and cell growth by as much as 50%. Using 3-D enhancer contact mapping, we find that these CREs almost always contact MYC but less than 10% of total MYC contacts impact growth when silenced, highlighting the utility of our approach to identify phenotypically-relevant CREs. We also detect an enrichment of lineage-specific transcription factors (TFs) at MYC CREs and, for some of these TFs, find a strong, tumor-specific correlation between TF and MYC expression not found in normal tissue. Taken together, these CREs represent systematically identified, functional regulatory regions and demonstrate how the same region of the human genome can give rise to complex, tissue-specific gene regulation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".