Full-scale characterization of the effects of a bioretention system on water quality and quantity following the replacement of a mixed stormwater and combined sewer system
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT Urbanization is leading to more frequent flooding as cities have more impervious surfaces and runoff exceeds the capacity of combined sewer systems. In heavy rainfall, contaminated excess water is discharged into the natural environment, damaging ecosystems and threatening drinking water sources. To address these challenges aggravated by climate change, urban blue-green water management systems, such as bioretention cells, are increasingly being adopted. Bioretention cells use substrate and plants adapted to the climate to manage rainwater. They form shallow depressions, allowing infiltration, storage, and gradual evacuation of runoff. In 2018, the City of Trois-Rivières (Québec, Canada) installed 54 bioretention cells along a residential street, several of which were equipped with access points to monitor performance. Groundwater quality was monitored through the installation of piezometers to detect potential contamination. This large-scale project aimed to improve stormwater quality and reduce sewer flows. The studied bioretention cells reduced the flow and generally improved water quality entering the sewer system, as well as the quality of stormwater, with some exceptions. Higher outflow concentrations were observed for contaminants such as manganese and nitrate. The results of this initiative provide useful recommendations for similar projects for urban climate change adaptation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it