MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407554556 · doi:10.1093/ornithapp/duaf013

Vantage point photography and deep learning methods save time in monitoring seabird nesting colonies

2025· article· en· W4407554556 on OpenAlexaffabout
Rosalin Wilkin, Jillian Anderson, Ishan Sahay, Samantha J.R. Broadley, Marine Gonse, Greg McClelland, Ruth Joy

Bibliographic record

VenueOrnithological applications · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicRemote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
Canadian institutionsEnvironment and Climate Change CanadaSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSeabirdNesting (process)PhotographyGeographyCitizen scienceComputer scienceEcologyVisual artsArtBiologyEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Monitoring seabird colonies is essential for assessing population health and sustainability amid increasing marine industry and climate change. Advancements in photography have led to high-resolution photogrammetry techniques for monitoring seabird colonies. However, manual counting of birds and nests in images, potentially over multiple dates and seasons, is time-consuming and has limited a wider adoption of photogrammetry in colony monitoring. We addressed the task of automatically counting cormorants and their nests using an SLT camera, a Gigapan robotic camera mount, and image-stitching software. We applied this system to Vancouver’s Ironworkers Memorial Second Narrows Bridge, home to British Columbia’s largest Nannopterum auritum (Double-crested Cormorant) colony. The system takes overlapping images of the colony from a vantage point to create a panoramic image. We took 23 images of the bridge between April and September 2021. A subset of these images was used to train a deep-learning model that became the foundation of an automated pipeline to detect cormorants of different sizes, positions (standing, incubating, or sunning with wings outstretched), and nests (including only partial glimpses among the bridge girders). Our pipeline demonstrated potential for monitoring cormorant populations, by lowering manual effort while achieving high agreement with manual counts. Specifically, our pipeline reduced the manual time required to process images by 96% while achieving an average agreement of 93.6% between manual and automated counts for both cormorants and nests. We found reduced performance from an application of our model to images of a novel colony; however, we suggest that with additional model training and fine-tuning, our pipeline should provide an efficient and accurate alternative to manual counts for other colonial bird monitoring contexts. Our study showcases that high-resolution photogrammetry combined with deep learning methods enables the automatic identification and counting of birds and nests, significantly reducing the time and effort of long-term monitoring of colonially nesting birds.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.360
Threshold uncertainty score0.512

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.290 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOrnithological applicationsSame topicRemote Sensing and LiDAR ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207