El giro fenomenológico de la hermenéutica según Heidegger, Gadamer y Ricoeur
Bibliographic record
Abstract
El texto es la traducción al español de un capítulo de Le tournant herméneutique de la phénoménologie que el profesor Grondin ha tenido la generosidad de revisar y corregir para el presente Dossier. El autor sostiene en este libro que el giro hermenéutico del que tanto se habla es en realidad el nombre de una radicalización del programa y de la mirada fenomenológica que se muestra atenta a la condición lingüística e histórica del sentido. Si el artesano de este giro fue, sin duda, Heidegger, Grondin cree que ya se estaba gestando en la propia fenomenología husserliana. La tesis que subyace a todo el libro es la necesidad recíproca tanto de la mirada fenomenológica como de la mirada hermenéutica para dar cuenta de nuestra situación vital. En la sección que presentamos aquí se explora cómo entendieron la relación entre fenomenología y hermenéutica Heidegger, Gadamer y Ricoeur, para concluir que “Una fenomenología sin hermenéutica es ciega y una hermenéutica sin fenomenología permanece vacía”.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.027 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.010 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".