Stress and Hypertension Among African American Female Family Caregivers of Persons Living With Alzheimer Disease and Related Dementias: Protocol for a Pilot Internet-Based Randomized Controlled Trial
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Caregivers of persons with Alzheimer disease and related dementias (ADRD) neglect their health, including by ignoring stress levels. African American women are vulnerable and susceptible to hypertension. Chronic caregiving stress and hypertension place them at high risk for cardiovascular disease. Addressing stress reactivity or resilience is vital in lessening their caregiving stress, enhancing their quality of life (QOL), and fostering healthy blood pressure (BP) self-care behaviors. OBJECTIVE: This pilot study aims to investigate the feasibility and acceptability of implementing the Mindfulness in Motion (MIM) plus the Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) intervention in this population and to evaluate its effect on ADRD caregivers' stress and QOL. Additionally, it explores the mediation of stress reactivity or resilience between interventions and self-care behaviors. METHODS: A small randomized controlled trial pilot study will recruit 28 African American or Black female caregivers aged 40 years diagnosed with hypertension and on an antihypertensive medication. Participants will be randomly assigned to either the MIM DASH or the Alzheimer's Association caregiver training group (attention control). Trained facilitators will deliver both interventions over 8 weeks through 1-hour, group, internet-based sessions, via video or telephone. After completion, both groups will receive coaching calls over 9 months, beginning with 8 weekly calls followed by 4 monthly calls to encourage use of the educational materials. Primary outcome measures include feasibility (recruitment and retention) and acceptability (attendance). Secondary measures assess caregiver stress (Perceived Stress Scale), QOL, and self-care behaviors (Food Frequency Questionnaire and self-reported physical activity). Data collection occurs at baseline, 3 months, and 9 months. Quantitative data will be analyzed using descriptive statistics, CIs, and mediation models. RESULTS: This study was approved by the institutional review board in April 2022 and funded in May 2022. The first data were collected in January 2023, and the last data were collected in September 2024. The completion of all aims' data analysis is anticipated in spring 2025. The participants' mean age was 62.4 (SD 7.98) years, with a mean baseline systolic BP of 128 (SD 19) mm Hg and diastolic BP of 79 (SD 10) mm Hg. Participants reported that MIM DASH was acceptable (at a mean score of 59.08, SD 7.38, compared to 60.83, SD 5.56 for caregiver training). Regarding feasibility, as reflected in attendance, MIM DASH participants had a mean attendance of 6.3 (SD 2.3) sessions, and the caregiver training group had 4.9 (SD 2.9) sessions. CONCLUSIONS: This study's findings demonstrate the feasibility of conducting an internet-based intervention (MIM DASH) for African American women with hypertension who also care for families living with ADRD. These results will inform the design of a larger randomized controlled trial to evaluate the intervention's efficacy and scalability further. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05721482; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05721482. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/66975.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.023 | 0.022 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.011 | 0.005 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.006 | 0.008 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.072 | 0.010 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".