MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4407567539 · doi:10.2196/67051

Novel Smartphone App and Supportive Accountability for the Treatment of Childhood Disruptive Behavior Problems: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial

2025· article· en· W4407567539 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Oliver Lindhiem, Claire S. Tomlinson, David J. Kolko, Jennifer S. Silk, Danella Hafeman, Meredith L. Wallace, I Made Agus Setiawan, Bambang Parmanto

Bibliographic record

VenueJMIR Research Protocols · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicDigital Mental Health Interventions
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human DevelopmentNational Institute of Mental Health
KeywordsPreprintProtocol (science)AccountabilityRandomized controlled trialSmartphone applicationPsychologyApplied psychologyComputer scienceMedicineMultimediaWorld Wide WebAlternative medicinePolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Although evidence-based treatments have been developed for childhood behavior problems, many families encounter barriers to treatment access and completion (eg, local availability of services, transportation, cost, and perceived stigma). Smartphone apps offer a cost-efficient method to deliver content to families. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of the UseIt! mobile health system as both stand-alone and coach-assisted interventions via a randomized controlled trial. The UseIt! System is designed to reduce disruptive behaviors in young children. METHODS: A nationwide sample of parents of children aged 5 years to 8 years with disruptive behaviors (N=324 dyads) are randomly assigned to the stand-alone app (UseIt!; n=108), the coach-assisted app (UseIt! plus supportive accountability; n=108), or the control app (mindfulness app; n=108). The UseIt! App provides parents with tools and troubleshooting to address disruptive behaviors, along with a behavior diary to track behaviors and strategies over time. The coach-assisted condition includes a bachelor's level paraprofessional who provides weekly phone calls to promote engagement with the app. The control condition is composed of a mindfulness app. The web-based, self-assessed outcome measures (post treatment and 6-month follow-up) include measures of app usage, parenting knowledge (eg, knowledge of parent management training and cognitive behavioral therapy skills), and strategies (use of evidence-based parenting strategies), symptom reduction (eg, behavior problems), and parent mental health (eg, anxiety, stress, and depression). We hypothesize that both intervention conditions will show greater parent knowledge and use of skills along with greater symptom reduction relative to the control condition. Further, we hypothesize that those assigned to the coach assisted condition will report greater knowledge, skill use, and symptom reduction than the stand-alone app. We will use intent-to-treat analyses to regress outcomes on study conditions to evaluate for differences across conditions. RESULTS: Recruitment of study participants began in December of 2022 and is ongoing. We have recruited over half of our intended sample of 324 parent-child dyads (n=214) as of December 2024. These dyads have been randomly allocated to each of the intervention conditions, with 71 assigned to the coach-assisted condition, 72 assigned to the stand-alone app, and 71 assigned to the control app condition. Data collection is projected to be completed by late 2026. CONCLUSIONS: The current study aims to address a gap in the literature regarding the feasibility, effectiveness, and utility of a smartphone app that includes a coach-assisted arm. Digital therapeutics have the potential to enhance the reach and scalability of skills-based psychosocial interventions. Findings from this study will advance scientific knowledge and have implications for clinical practice. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05647772; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05647772. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/67051.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.028
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.028
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Protocol · Consensus signal: Protocol
Teacher disagreement score0.103
Threshold uncertainty score0.344

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0280.028
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0060.003
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0120.006
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0040.004
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0040.002
Research integrity0.0070.010
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1030.014

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.200
GPT teacher head0.605
Teacher spread0.406 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreProtocol

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJMIR Research Protocols→Same topicDigital Mental Health Interventions→French-language works237,207→