MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407568773 · doi:10.1101/2025.02.10.25322026

Multi-institutional Normal Tissue Complication Probability (NTCP) Prediction Model for Mandibular Osteoradionecrosis: Results from the PREDMORN Study

2025· preprint· en· W4407568773 on OpenAlexaff
Laia Humbert‐Vidan, Christian Rønn Hansen, Steven Petit, Carles Muñoz‐Montplet, Abdallah Mohamed, Deborah Saunders, Vinod Patel, Gerda M. Verduijn, Wilma D. Heemsbergen, A. van der Schaaf, Max J. H. Witjes, Suzanne P.M. de Vette, Abdul A. Khan, Jordi Marruecos Querol, Irene Oliveras Cancio, Mike Oliver, Peter B. Reich, Stacey A. Santi, Andrew Pearce, Stephen Y. Lai, Andrew P. King, Johannes A. Langendijk, Jørgen Johansen, Amy C. Moreno, Clifton D. Fuller, Lisanne V. van Dijk, Teresa Guerrero Urbano

Bibliographic record

VenuemedRxiv · 2025
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHead and Neck Cancer Studies
Canadian institutionsNOSM UniversityLaurentian UniversityHealth Sciences North
FundersNational Institute of Dental and Craniofacial ResearchUniversity of Texas MD Anderson Cancer CenterElektaZonMwDivision of Civil, Mechanical and Manufacturing InnovationNational Cancer InstituteNational Institutes of HealthNational Science FoundationCancer Research UKSiemens Healthineers
KeywordsOsteoradionecrosisComplicationDentistryMedicineOrthodonticsRadiation therapySurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Mandibular osteoradionecrosis (ORN) is a severe late complication affecting patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) treated with radiotherapy that significantly impacts patients’ quality of life and can require costly interventions. While radiation dose is a key factor, other clinical and demographic risk factors influence ORN development. Previous predictive models have primarily been single-institutional, limiting their generalizability. The PREDMORN Consortium was established to address these limitations. In this first analysis, we have aimed to reproduce existing statistical association and modelling analyses on the largest and most diverse mandibular ORN cohort worldwide to allow comparison with previous studies. As such, we have developed, tested and externally validated a multi-institutional normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) model for mandibular ORN. Methods This retrospective multi-institutional study included 1,184 HNC patients (389 ORN cases) from seven institutions. Clinical, demographic, and dosimetric (DVH) variables were analysed to develop a prediction model (any grade of ORN vs. no ORN) using forward stepwise logistic regression with correlation-based variable pre-selection. The ORN NTCP model was developed on 80% of data from six institutions, tested on the remaining unseen 20%, and externally validated on the seventh institution’s dataset. Results Key predictors of ORN were D30%, V70Gy, pre-RT dental extractions, and smoking status. The ORN NTCP model demonstrated good calibration and predictive performance, with AUCs of 0.69 for internal testing and external validation, which improved when tested on a sub-cohort of oropharyngeal and locally advanced larynx/hypopharynx cancer cases (AUCs of 0.75). Conclusion The PREDMORN NTCP model is the largest multi-institutional effort to predict ORN risk in HNC patients. We provide guidance on how to adjust the NTCP predicted probabilities for differences in target population baseline ORN risk to facilitate application of the model. Future research will focus on incorporating imaging-based spatial data and further external validation to enhance clinical applicability.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.015
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.021
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.079

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0150.021
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.079
GPT teacher head0.337
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuemedRxivSame topicHead and Neck Cancer StudiesFrench-language works237,207