Small Area Estimation of Education Levels in Low- and Middle-Income Countries
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Education is a key driver of social and economic mobility, yet disparities in attainment persist, particularly in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Existing indicators, such as mean years of schooling for adults aged 25 and older (MYS25) and expected years of schooling (EYS), offer a snapshot of an educational system, but lack either cohort-specific or temporal granularity. To address these limitations, we introduce the ultimate years of schooling (UYS)-a birth cohort-based metric targeting the final educational attainment of any individual cohort, including those with ongoing schooling trajectories. As with many attainment indicators, we propose to estimate UYS with cross-sectional household surveys. However, for younger cohorts, estimation fails, because these individuals are right-censored leading to severe downwards bias. To correct for this, we propose to re-frame educational attainment as a time-to-event process and deploy discrete-time survival models that explicitly account for censoring in the observations. At the national level, we estimate the parameters of the model using survey-weighted logistic regression, while for finer spatial resolutions, where sample sizes are smaller, we embed the discrete-time survival model within a Bayesian spatiotemporal framework to improve stability and precision. Applying our proposed methods to data from the 2022 Tanzania Demographic and Health Surveys, we estimate female educational trajectories corrected for censoring biases, and reveal substantial subnational disparities. By providing a dynamic, bias-corrected, and spatially disaggregated measure, our approach enhances education monitoring; it equips policymakers and researchers with a more precise tool for monitoring current progress towards education goals, and for designing future targeted policy interventions in LMICs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".