Compression of Site-Specific Deep Neural Networks for Massive MIMO Precoding
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The deployment of deep learning (DL) models for precoding in massive multiple-input multiple-output (mMIMO) systems is often constrained by high computational demands and energy consumption. In this paper, we investigate the compute energy efficiency of mMIMO precoders using DL-based approaches, comparing them to conventional methods such as zero forcing and weighted minimum mean square error (WMMSE). Our energy consumption model accounts for both memory access and calculation energy within DL accelerators. We propose a framework that incorporates mixed-precision quantization-aware training and neural architecture search to reduce energy usage without compromising accuracy. Using a ray-tracing dataset covering various base station sites, we analyze how site-specific conditions affect the energy efficiency of compressed models. Our results show that deep neural network compression generates precoders with up to 35 times higher energy efficiency than WMMSE at equal performance, depending on the scenario and the desired rate. These results establish a foundation and a benchmark for the development of energy-efficient DL-based mMIMO precoders.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".