MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4407571097 · doi:10.1103/jqn8-19gx

Measurements of the thermal Sunyaev-Zel’dovich effect with ACT and DESI luminous red galaxies

2025· article· en· W4407571097 on OpenAlexafffund
R. Henry Liu, Simone Ferraro, Emmanuel Schaan, Rongpu Zhou, J. Aguilar, S. P. Ahlen, Nicholas Battaglia, Davide Bianchi, David Brooks, T. Claybaugh, Shaun Cole, William R. Coulton, Axel de la Macorra, Arjun Dey, K. Fanning, J. E. Forero-Romero, E. Gaztañaga, Yulin Gong, Satya Gontcho A Gontcho, D. Gruen, G. Gutiérrez, Boryana Hadzhiyska, Klaus Honscheid, Cullan Howlett, R. Kehoe, Theodore Kisner, Aleksandra Kusiak, Andrew Lambert, Martin Landriau, L. Le Guillou, M. E. Levi, Martine Lokken, Marc Manera, Paul Martini, Aaron Meisner, R. Miquel, Kavilan Moodley, Jeffrey A. Newman, Gustavo Niz, N. Palanque‐Delabrouille, Will J. Percival, Francisco Prada, Ignasi Pérez-Ràfols, Bernardita Ried Guachalla, Graziano Rossi, E. Sánchez, David J. Schlegel, M. Schubnell, Hee‐Jong Seo, Cristobál Sifón, David Sprayberry, G. Tarlé, Eve M. Vavagiakis, Benjamin A. Weaver, Edward J. Wollack, Hu Zou

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. D/Physical review. D. · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
Canadian institutionsPerimeter InstituteUniversity of Waterloo
FundersSLAC National Accelerator LaboratoryHigh Energy PhysicsScience and Technology Facilities CouncilNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaOffice of ScienceGordon and Betty Moore FoundationNational Institute of Standards and TechnologyAgencia Nacional de Investigación y DesarrolloMinisterio de Ciencia e InnovaciónUniversity of TorontoConsejo Nacional de Ciencia y TecnologíaChinese Academy of SciencesCommissariat à l'Énergie Atomique et aux Énergies AlternativesNational Energy Research Scientific Computing CenterHeising-Simons FoundationNational Science FoundationCompute CanadaCanada Foundation for InnovationNational Aeronautics and Space AdministrationLawrence Berkeley National LaboratoryDivision of Astronomical SciencesUniversity of PennsylvaniaUniversity of British ColumbiaCalifornia Institute of TechnologyU.S. Department of EnergyJet Propulsion LaboratoryPrinceton UniversityGovernment of Ontario
KeywordsPhysicsSunyaev–Zel'dovich effectCosmic microwave backgroundAstrophysicsGalaxy clusterSouth Pole TelescopeRedshiftAstronomyGalaxy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) photons scatter off the free-electron gas in galaxies and clusters, allowing us to use the CMB as a backlight to probe the gas in and around low-redshift galaxies. The thermal Sunyaev-Zel'dovich effect, sourced by hot electrons in high-density environments, measures the thermal pressure of the target objects, shedding light on halo thermodynamics and galaxy formation, and providing a path toward understanding the baryon distribution around cosmic structures. We use a combination of high-resolution CMB maps from the Atacama Cosmology Telescope and photometric luminous red galaxy catalogs from the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument to measure the thermal Sunyaev-Zel'dovich signal in four redshift bins from $z=0.4$ to $z=1.2$, with a combined detection significance of $19\ensuremath{\sigma}$ when stacking on the fiducial CMB Compton-$y$ map. We discuss possible sources of contamination, finding that residual dust emission associated with the target galaxies is important and limits current analyses. We discuss several mitigation strategies and quantify the residual modeling uncertainty. This work complements closely related measurements of the kinematic Sunyaev-Zel'dovich and weak lensing of the same galaxies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Direct model labels (unvalidated)

Per-model category and study-design labels from the labeling rounds. They are machine output, unvalidated, and the disagreement between models ships as data. No study design here is MEDLINE-validated yet.

Model armCategoriesStudy designConfidence
gemmano category
Domain: not available · Genre: Empirical
About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no
Observationallow
gptno category
Domain: not available · Genre: Empirical
About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no
Observationallow
models agreeAgreement compares identical category sets and study designs across arms.

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.335
Teacher spread0.324 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Labeled directly by 2 models reading the full record.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. D/Physical review. D.→Same topicGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena→French-language works237,207→