MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407572498 · doi:10.1016/j.petsci.2025.02.004

Multidisciplinary insights into the origin of natural gas from hydrocarbon generation and charging history of Permian dolomite reservoir in Sichuan Basin

2025· article· en· W4407572498 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePetroleum Science · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersSINOPEC Petroleum Exploration and Production Research InstituteNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsDolomitePermianNatural gasGeologyStructural basinHydrocarbon explorationMultidisciplinary approachNatural (archaeology)Mining engineeringPetroleum engineeringGeochemistryPaleontologyArchaeologyGeographyEngineeringPolitical scienceWaste managementLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Understanding the origin of natural gas in deep and ultra-deep reservoirs with multiple potential source rocks remains challenging due to the complex thermal evolution of hydrocarbons at high temperatures and multi-stage accumulation processes. This study investigates the origin of natural gas in deep hydrothermal dolomite reservoirs of the Maokou Formation, eastern Sichuan Basin , using hydrocarbon inclusion analysis, radiometric U-Pb dating of calcite cements, maturity modeling of potential source rocks, and constraints on reactivation periods of the nearby No. 15 Fault System. Results indicate an oil charging event at approximately 246.9 Ma, followed by two episodes of gas charging at 222.4 Ma and 175.2 Ma. Furthermore, the oil and gas charging events occurred synchronously with activities of the No. 15 Fault System, suggesting that its reactivation induced episodic hydrocarbon migration . Maturity modeling indicates that during the oil charging period, source rocks in the Qiongzhusi, Wufeng-Longmaxi, and first member of the Maokou formations reached the stages of dry gas generation, significant oil generation, and the threshold of oil generation, respectively. During the subsequent two-episode gas charging periods, the Qiongzhusi and Wufeng-Longmaxi formations progressed to dry and wet gas generation stages, respectively, while the first member of the Maokou Formation attained the oil generation stage. The hydrocarbon charging time and maturity history of potential source rocks indicate that: 1) oil in hydrothermal dolomite reservoirs predominantly originated from the Wufeng-Longmaxi Formation at approximately 246.9 Ma; 2) during the subsequent gas charging episodes, the Wufeng-Longmaxi Formation could contribute wet gas, while the Qiongzhusi Formation likely supplied cracking gas from kerogen and residual liquid hydrocarbon; 3) all oil in the hydrothermal dolomite reservoirs underwent thermal cracking to gas at approximately 110 Ma. This study indicates that gas pools in (ultra-)deep carbonate reservoirs of the Sichuan Basin have mixed genetic origins, with contributions from multiple sources. The multidisciplinary approach, combining direct dating of hydrocarbon charge events and simulation of hydrocarbon generation , proves robust and effective in identifying the origin of natural gas in (ultra-)deep reservoirs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.883
Threshold uncertainty score0.320

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it