Reinforcement learning for navigation in percutaneous coronary arteries interventions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is a widely used minimally invasive procedure to treat coronary artery disease. Despite its benefits, PCI relies heavily on the dexterity of the operator and can be highly challenging during navigation. Advances in robot-assisted PCI have shown promise in reducing these risks and enhancing procedural precision. This study presents the development and in silico evaluation of a simulation environment equipped with reinforcement learning (RL) to enable autonomous catheter navigation for PCI, with potential applications in training operators and assisting in real-time procedure guidance. Developed using Unity 3D and Unity ML-Agents, our model utilizes a simulation environment to train RL agents for catheter guidance. The navigation within the coronary arteries was modeled using Unity’s game engine, which allows for realistic catheter movements and collision detection with vessel walls using mesh colliders. The automatic catheterization employs a goal-based binary function, reinforced by a checkpoint reward system that directs the agent's movements toward successful navigation. To evaluate the model, extensive simulation trials were conducted with different movement boundaries to track learning progress and refine training strategies. The results from these in silico trials suggest significant improvements in procedural safety and efficiency, indicated by a reduction in navigation error from an initial average of 0.05 (±0.01) mm to less than 0.01 (±0.002) mm. Cumulative rewards steadily increased, showing a final average of 0.5 (±0.1) mm in reward values. These metrics demonstrate the model’s ability to adapt and optimize its performance for a range of catheter navigation scenarios. However, the evaluation is limited to a virtual environment, and further work is necessary to assess how these findings translate to real-world clinical applications. In particular, integrating this RL-based approach with live PCI procedures will require addressing patient-specific variability, real-time physiological changes, and ensuring safe interaction between the AI agent and human operators during procedures. This study represents an important step toward incorporating AI into cardiac healthcare, but practical implementation in clinical settings will require further investigation, including experimental or clinical validation. Future research should focus on testing the method alongside human operators in controlled clinical environments to evaluate its effectiveness as a real-time guidance tool during PCI.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".