MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407574609 · doi:10.2106/jbjs.24.00164

Delayed-Onset Neurologic Changes Following Posterior Spinal Fusion

2025· article· en· W4407574609 on OpenAlexaff
Nicholas D. Fletcher, Hilary Harris, Jorge Fabregas, John S. Vorhies, Paul D. Sponseller, Baron S. Lonner, Stephen G. George, Sumeet Garg, John F. Lovejoy, Michael G. Vitale, Brandon Ramo, Ron El‐Hawary, Viral V. Jain, Jennifer M. Bauer

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Bone and Joint Surgery · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicIntraoperative Neuromonitoring and Anesthetic Effects
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineSurgerySpinal deformityComplicationSpinal cord injuryRetrospective cohort studySpinal cordSpinal fusionAnesthesiaBlood pressureCobb angleDeformityRadiographyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Delayed-onset neurologic changes (DONCs) following spinal deformity surgery are poorly understood and are often devastating. METHODS: A retrospective review of cases from 12 hospitals was performed. The clinical and radiographic parameters of patients who experienced a new DONC after spinal deformity correction were evaluated. RESULTS: Eighteen patients, with a mean preoperative major Cobb angle of 75° ± 24°, were included. The mean age at surgery was 13 ± 2 years, and 6 patients (33%) were male. Seven patients had temporary intraoperative neuromonitoring changes. Fourteen patients (78%) had neurologic changes within 24 hours postoperatively (range, 3 to 24 hours). Of 16 patients with blood pressure data, 8 (50%) had at least 1 documented episode of hypotension surrounding the change in neurologic status. No misaligned implants were seen on axial imaging. Fourteen patients (78%) were treated with vasopressors. Sixteen patients (89%) returned to the operating room, and 11 patients (61%) underwent implant removal. Seven patients (39%) sustained a spinal cord infarct, with only 1 (6%) experiencing recovery beyond an ASIA (American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale) score of B. Ten (91%) of the 11 patients without an infarct demonstrated recovery (5 patients with an ASIA score of D and 5 with a score of E). CONCLUSIONS: A DONC is a rare complication of spinal deformity surgery. This study represents the largest documented series of DONCs and highlights the multifactorial and still poorly understood nature of this condition. The primary modifiable risk factor may be hypotension in the postoperative period: 50% of patients had a mean arterial pressure below the 5th percentile for their height, as documented around the time of the neurologic change. Eighty-six percent of patients with a spinal cord infarct had minimal neurologic recovery, whereas nearly all of the patients without an infarct did recover function. The management of this condition may include elevation of blood pressure with temporary implant removal. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level IV . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.670
Threshold uncertainty score0.306

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Bone and Joint SurgerySame topicIntraoperative Neuromonitoring and Anesthetic EffectsFrench-language works237,207