MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407577764 · doi:10.1186/s12880-025-01580-w

A nomogram for diagnosis of BI-RADS 4 breast nodules based on three-dimensional volume ultrasound

2025· article· en· W4407577764 on OpenAlexaff
Xianping Jiang, Chen Chen, Jincao Yao, Liping Wang, Chen Yang, Wei Li, Di Ou, Zhiyan Jin, Yuanzhen Liu, Chanjuan Peng, Yifan Wang, Dong Xu

Bibliographic record

VenueBMC Medical Imaging · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBreast Lesions and Carcinomas
Canadian institutionsArtificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBI-RADSNomogramUltrasoundVolume (thermodynamics)RadiologyComputer scienceMedicineUltrasonographyBreast imagingBreast ultrasoundMammographyBreast cancerOncologyCancerInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVES: The classification of malignant breast nodules into four categories according to the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) presents significant variability, posing challenges in clinical diagnosis. This study investigates whether a nomogram prediction model incorporating automated breast ultrasound system (ABUS) can improve the accuracy of differentiating benign and malignant BI-RADS 4 breast nodules. METHODS: Data were collected for a total of 257 nodules with breast nodules corresponding to BI-RADS 4 who underwent ABUS examination and for whom pathology results were obtained from January 2019 to August 2022. The participants were divided into a benign group (188 cases) and a malignant group (69 cases) using a retrospective study method. Ultrasound imaging features were recorded. Logistic regression analysis was used to screen the clinical and ultrasound characteristics. Using the results of these analyses, a nomogram prediction model was established accordingly. RESULTS: Age, distance between nodule and nipple, calcification and C-plane convergence sign were independent risk factors that enabled differentiation between benign and malignant breast nodules (all P < 0.05). A nomogram model was established based on these variables. The area under curve (AUC) values for the nomogram model, age, distance between nodule and nipple, calcification, and C-plane convergence sign were 0.86, 0.735, 0.645, 0.697, and 0.685, respectively. Thus, the AUC value for the model was significantly higher than a single variable. CONCLUSIONS: A nomogram based on the clinical and ultrasound imaging features of ABUS can be used to improve the accuracy of the diagnosis of benign and malignant BI-RADS 4 nodules. It can function as a relatively accurate predictive tool for sonographers and clinicians and is therefore clinically useful. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE STATEMENT: we retrospectively analyzed the clinical and ultrasound characteristics of ABUS BI-RADS 4 nodules and established a nomogram model to improve the efficiency of the majority of ABUS readers in the diagnosis of BI-RADS 4 nodules.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.130
Threshold uncertainty score0.721

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBMC Medical ImagingSame topicBreast Lesions and CarcinomasFrench-language works237,207