A nomogram for diagnosis of BI-RADS 4 breast nodules based on three-dimensional volume ultrasound
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The classification of malignant breast nodules into four categories according to the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) presents significant variability, posing challenges in clinical diagnosis. This study investigates whether a nomogram prediction model incorporating automated breast ultrasound system (ABUS) can improve the accuracy of differentiating benign and malignant BI-RADS 4 breast nodules. METHODS: Data were collected for a total of 257 nodules with breast nodules corresponding to BI-RADS 4 who underwent ABUS examination and for whom pathology results were obtained from January 2019 to August 2022. The participants were divided into a benign group (188 cases) and a malignant group (69 cases) using a retrospective study method. Ultrasound imaging features were recorded. Logistic regression analysis was used to screen the clinical and ultrasound characteristics. Using the results of these analyses, a nomogram prediction model was established accordingly. RESULTS: Age, distance between nodule and nipple, calcification and C-plane convergence sign were independent risk factors that enabled differentiation between benign and malignant breast nodules (all P < 0.05). A nomogram model was established based on these variables. The area under curve (AUC) values for the nomogram model, age, distance between nodule and nipple, calcification, and C-plane convergence sign were 0.86, 0.735, 0.645, 0.697, and 0.685, respectively. Thus, the AUC value for the model was significantly higher than a single variable. CONCLUSIONS: A nomogram based on the clinical and ultrasound imaging features of ABUS can be used to improve the accuracy of the diagnosis of benign and malignant BI-RADS 4 nodules. It can function as a relatively accurate predictive tool for sonographers and clinicians and is therefore clinically useful. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE STATEMENT: we retrospectively analyzed the clinical and ultrasound characteristics of ABUS BI-RADS 4 nodules and established a nomogram model to improve the efficiency of the majority of ABUS readers in the diagnosis of BI-RADS 4 nodules.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".