MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407584026 · doi:10.1111/stan.70004

A note on bayesian nonparametric survival function estimators for combined cohort data

2025· article· en· W4407584026 on OpenAlexafffund
Emily Erick, James H. McVittie

Bibliographic record

VenueStatistica Neerlandica · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicStatistical Methods and Inference
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Regina
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsEstimatorNonparametric statisticsStatisticsMathematicsSurvival functionBayesian probabilityCohortFunction (biology)EconometricsBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The availability of both right‐censored and left‐truncated right‐censored failure time data commonly occurs when failure/censoring times are collected by cross‐sectioning the population and acquiring new failure/censoring times during a follow‐up period. Under a frequentist paradigm, the Kaplan‐Meier estimator can be adjusted to account for both types of data separately when estimating the failure time survival function. In this note, we review the analogous Bayesian nonparametric survival function estimators that are applicable to the individual types of data, separately, and propose two Bayesian nonparametric survival function estimators using both the right‐censored and left‐truncated right‐censored failure time data, simultaneously.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.057
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.121
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.057
Threshold uncertainty score0.300

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0570.121
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.003
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0020.005
Open science0.0030.003
Research integrity0.0030.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.070
GPT teacher head0.402
Teacher spread0.332 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStatistica NeerlandicaSame topicStatistical Methods and InferenceFrench-language works237,207